The Tech Industry is a “Special Interest” too!

Vox Indie’s Ellen Seidler points out that the Tech Industry is a special interest too in response to Derek Khanna’s assertion that “Hollywood” or rather the musicians, artists, filmmakers, photographers and other creators are a “special interest” who should not have a voice in how the fruits of their own labor are monetized and exploited, and by whom.

Let us not forget that these are rights not just granted by the United States Constitution but also in Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human rights proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948.

Derek Khanna argues that the special interest that is the elite Silicon Valley internet and tech businesses who profit from exploiting artists should be making the rules. Fancy that, self serving, self interests for profit hungry corporations the size of a nation states wanting to make their own rules over the proceeds from individual labor.

Mr. Khanna gives readers a list of examples that, to him, demonstrate why copyright law is bad for creators and industry innovators alike. Why’s that a problem? Well, it’s a problem because, as is often the case with the copy-left, he doesn’t see fit to talk to tell the full story as to how crucial copyright protection is for those whose livelihoods depend on content creation. Khanna lists Hank Shocklee of Public Enemy, as an example of an artist constrained by current copyright law, but fails to mention that while Shocklee is a musician, he’s known for work often derived from sampling the work of others. His situation is not exactly representative of all artists, musical or otherwise, who have a stake in this debate.

Why not talk to some 45% of professional musicians who are no longer working in large part because our current copyright law is flouted by today’s digital pirate profiteers? Why not make mention of the independent filmmakers whose innovations are routinely stolen and monetized by bootleggers and online thieves?

READ THE FULL POST HERE AT VOX INDIE:
http://voxindie.org/Derek-Khanna-one-sided-copyright-reform

YOU MAY ALSO ENJOY:
Derek Khanna is Wrong: Copyleft Mystery Man’s Misleading Memo Creates its Own Myths…

Time For Silicon Valley To Grow Up And Take Responsibility For Their Online Advertising Business Model.

About Trichordist Editor

Trichordist Editor

One thought on “The Tech Industry is a “Special Interest” too!

  1. I was curious about Shocklee’s perspective, and I found this article:

    http://faculty.sunydutchess.edu/allen/waxpoetics/Volume-12.htm

    He discusses the idea of how the Bomb Squad used “millions” of samples, and how it would be impossible to get the clearances for a record like that now. An interesting point, but I particularly found the last paragraph telling:

    ——————————————————————————————
    Is the music is sample based?

    I don’t have to sample anymore. There are so many ways to achieve the sample texture that there is no need to rely on samples. In the 1980s, we had to rely on samples to get certain textures from records. Now I can emulate all the ingredients without taking a sample. I can start with horn then mix with it grain, noise, bring down the bits, compress it. It’s then going to sound like a sample. I might still add some discord and maybe the discord will be in concert with the listener.

    I am still creating frequencies and vibrations.
    ——————————————————————————————

    So…Mr. Shocklee discovered that he could create his own sounds rather than sampling them, and basically negates his entire argument that “you can’t create that anymore”. Hmm.

Comments are closed.