We encourage comments and ideas from our readers. And you knew it was coming so here’s the “but”–first but, we all do other things and have a limited amount of time to devote to these conversations. So comments are left open for four days, which hopefully is enough time. If you have something really important you want to add on a post where comments are closed, send a message to one of the writers.
If you want to send us a DMCA notice, send it to copyright [at] trichordist dot com. We take copyright very seriously and so should you. That’s one reason we don’t post links in comments. If you really want to link to something, just describe the source material (you know, like a footnote) and people can figure it out.
Don’t threaten anybody. We take all that stuff very seriously and react in ways that can really ruin your whole day–within the law.
You can contact us with general inquiries by sending an email directly to : the trichordist (one word) [at] mail dot com.
NOTICE AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS REGARDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND TEXT AND DATA MINING
All rights are expressly reserved in all content made available on thetrichordist.com, including without limitation all text, musical works, sound recordings, audio, audiovisual works, photographs, still images, artwork, graphics, metadata and other content or intellectual property.
No such content may be scraped, crawled, copied, extracted, downloaded, ingested, tokenized, indexed, embedded, analyzed, processed or otherwise used, directly or indirectly, in connection with any artificial intelligence, machine-learning or generative-AI system, model, tool, dataset or service, including for purposes of training, pre-training, fine-tuning, retrieval or retrieval-augmented generation, grounding, evaluation, benchmarking, reinforcement learning, model optimization, synthetic-data generation, or the development or improvement of any model, system, product or service. The creation of derivatives, adaptations, simulations or other outputs based upon or derived from such content through the use of artificial intelligence or machine learning is likewise prohibited.
This notice constitutes an express reservation of all rights and, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, an express opt-out from any exception, limitation or other authorization for text and data mining, machine learning, artificial-intelligence training or comparable computational use, including without limitation a reservation of rights for purposes of Article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2019/790 and any implementing, successor or analogous law in any jurisdiction. This reservation applies to all automated agents, crawlers, scrapers, bots and other automated or computational means of access, whether presently known or later developed, and is intended to constitute a machine-readable and human-readable reservation wherever either form of notice is recognized or required.
No failure or inability of any automated system to detect, recognize, interpret or honor this notice constitutes consent, authorization, waiver or abandonment of any right. No license is granted expressly, impliedly, by estoppel or otherwise. All rights are reserved.
Permission for any of the foregoing uses will not be granted at any price.

A great start would be for the debate to include the voices of ordinary workers in the industry – average working musicians, small bands, studio personnel, independent producers and independent labels.
The loudest voices putting forward the view of content creators so far have been ‘rock legends’ and industry bodies such as RIAA. Both are routinely and quickly discredited (rightly or wrongly) by the anti-copyright contingent online.
I originally wrote my article in response to a blog by a technology journalist. These are the people who are blithely accepted as ‘speaking the truth’.
After reading your Emily White letter, I felt I had to reply. My daughters, now 15 and 19, once thought I was the meanest mother on the planet because I wouldn’t allow them to download music illegally. The majority if their friends pirate music (have done so for years) and think absolutely nothing of it. They feel that it’s out there, so why not take advantage of it. Every few weeks my daughter hands me a $10 or $20 bill and asks me to put money on her iTunes account. I usually roll my eyes and think, “Not again?” Well, from now on when one of them hands me money I’m going to feel proud that I raised them right. (And being the meanest mom is sometimes the best thing to do.)
In response to David Lowery, Professor at the University of Georgia
I would have to say that you almost lost me at the beginning of your article by not wanting to shame or embarrass Emily White at NPR who has admitted to stealing upward of 11,000 songs off of the internet but, after reading the whole article I can see you were trying to bring her conscience out of the closet and compel her to do the right thing, of her own will.
It was a noble & selfless attempt to cause someone to do what they should. I hope it works. Unfortunately we may never really know.
In the mean time, I’ll make sure that Emily White at NPR becomes a household name with the attorneys at corporations like Itunes & CD Baby not to mention all of my Indie Artist friends and music industry professionals. NPR has deep pockets, lets see what the lawyers have to say about that, see if we can’t get get some compensation going for the family’s of people like Vic Chessnut and Mark Linkous and all the other recording artists she bent over.
I was planning to release a CD through CD Baby. I think I’ll hold off now.
I wonder if Emily White at NPR is starting to feel the heat now?
Does anybody have a photo of Emily White at NPR. I would love to help her make her star shine.
Sincerely, Eric Andrew
SixGunRoad@gmail.com
Also moved by the letter. David, I’d like to talk to you about a project I’m working on. Please drop me a line.