The Trichordist International Translations – Deutschen, Français, Italiano, Español

Four international translations via Google Translate.

https://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/international-translations/

In German Via Google Translate : The Trichordist – Artists For An Ethical Internet
In der deutschen Via Google Translate: Die Trichordist – Künstler für eine ethische Internet
http://bit.ly/TrichordistGerman

In French Via Google Translate : The Trichordist – Artists For An Ethical Internet
En français Via Google Translate: Le Trichordist – Artistes pour un Internet éthique
http://bit.ly/TrichordistFrench

In Spanish Via Google Translate : The Trichordist – Artists For An Ethical Internet
En español a través de Google Translate: El Trichordist – Artistas para una Internet Ética
http://bit.ly/TrichordistSpanish

In Italian Via Google Translate : The Trichordist – Artists For An Ethical Internet
In italiano via Google Translate: Il Trichordist – Artisti Per Un Internet etica
http://bit.ly/TrichordistItalian

Artists Deserve to be Compensated For Their Work by Mark Isham

By Mark Isham for ibuymymusic.org
(Copyright in the Author, Posted with Permission)

Music is something that used to have a manageable business model, but with new technology appearing everyday, manageable isn’t even close. When Shawn Fanning decided to take a crack at technology and created Napster in 1999, the largest file sharing program in the world, he revolutionized the way in which music reaches its audience, changing the entire meaning behind the word “consumer.”

Illegal exploitation of the artists work is now a learned behavior. Artists’ popularity is now based on ticket sales, tweets and Facebook Likes, but not on music sales. Michael Jackson, the King of Pop, and Katy Perry, arguably the new Queen of Pop, both tied five number one singles off of one album by the Billboard Hot 100 Charts, Bad (1987) and Teenage Dream (2010). Yet, compare the sales of these two albums; that is a whole different kettle of songs.

Although music consumption is at the highest it has ever been, the majority of it is being consumed illegally. Steve Jobs had the right idea with the invention of iTunes, making music more accessible than ever. But even with success such as his, illegal distribution is the market owner. Digital music consumption has hit a plateau, only increasing by 13% in 2009. The reason why these sales are so low is that with just a click of a button, type in “Telephone” by Lady Gaga (the most illegally distributed song of 2010) and you will be lead directly to the first site in which you can get that song for free, thanks to Google. So Google profits from the illegal exploitation of the artists’ work, but not the artist themselves. This is the real problem: companies and corporations profiting by illegally distributing the artists work.

Employment numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show a drop of 45.3 percent between August 2002 and August of 2011 “musical groups and artists”.  Music piracy hurts both the music producers and the music consumers. I’m not the only one affected by this; most, if not all, professional artists have taken a slump in recorded music sales due to the illegal distribution and leaks.

Michael Jackson’s Bad has sold over an estimated 30-45 million copies worldwide. Katy Perry’s Teenage Dream, combining digital and physical sales, has sold 5.5 million total album copies worldwide, a mere fraction of Jackson’s total sales. However, she has tied him with being the only artist to have five number one singles on the Billboard Hot 100 Chart from one album. Her total sales should represent her lasting power on the charts, but they don’t, proving further that the majority of listeners are gaining access to music illegally. Ask any teenager how they access their music — most will tell you they download it illegally.

I Buy My Music (www.ibuymymusic.org) is a new campaign I’ve launched with the hopes of making the realization that obtaining music illegally is taking away more than just money, it’s taking away art — an expression of feeling and power. I Buy My Music is a way of bringing awareness to the quality of life music brings to everyone — taking pride in buying art and supporting our artists and fellow man by reveling in his or her expression.

An artist is only an artist because of the music they produce — it’s their existence. Each song is an individual masterpiece, and the illegal exploitation of the artists work violates this human respect of art. We all love music and should be able to enjoy it. I would like us all to recognize that the artist can only continue to create music from our show of support by purchasing their music, rather than stealing it from them. With the continuation of illegal downloading, artists will be incapable of producing more high quality music that is representative of dedicated, committed and highly trained professionals. I admire and respect musicians, wanting them to continue with the creation of great music, and I encourage all of us to do the same before it’s too late.

Mark Isham, John Morton, Paul Williams

Launch and Iterate: Google’s Permissionless Innovation.

Every once in a while Google will accidentally reveal their true  nature through some cute slogan or catchphrase.

There is of course their famous corporate slogan  “Don’t be evil”.

As noted previously, we at The Trichordist believe that  “Don’t be evil” is not their corporate slogan but secretly their  corporate reminder.  Eric Schmidt has this written on the back of his hand in black marker.

Then there is their Net Neutrality campaign slogan they farmed out to one of their astro-turf organizations:  “We are the web.”   Yes Google we are quite aware that you think that “you are the web”. That you believe you own the web and all of our personal data.  Sergey Brin recently became apoplexic when discussing the fact that companies like Facebook and Apple have “closed” ecosystems that do not allow Google to scrape all of their data.    “How dare they? We Are the Web!”

Like Germans Google is mostly unintentionally funny.   Last week’s howler came in hearings on Capitol Hill. Google’s Internet Evangelist  Vint Cerf let this slip out:

“Such proposals raise the prospect of policies that enable government controls but greatly diminish the ‘permissionless innovation’ that underlies extraordinary Internet-based economic growth, to say nothing of trampling human rights,” said Vint Cerf.”

Now I understand that Vint Cerf was talking about some specific  proposals  from authoritarian governments that would  really truly be a threat to free access to the internet.  For once I agree with a Google spokesperson. But what caused me to guffaw was the phrase “permissionless innovation”.   It slipped out so smoothly and seemed so well-worn it was as if  Google’s collective Id  was speaking directly to us all.

It  seems particularly significant when you combine that with Van Lohman’s ( Google Senior Copyright Counsel)  cheerful admission of  Google’s “Launch and Iterate” copyright contempt strategy.  As reported in the Huffington Post:

Fred von Lohmann, senior copyright counsel at Google, reflected on how copyright has been an issue since the earliest search engines. Asked how to address the various obstacles of digital platforms, he cheerfully sloganeered “As we say at Google ‘launch and iterate,’ ” by which he meant the best approach for digital media companies, since the waters of copyright will remain murky for some time, is simply to launch content, learn from the inevitable public and legal response and then improve. The “launch and iterate” mentality allows for experiments in freedom of expression as well as public participation.

This same wonderful “experiment” also allows google to make plenty of money by exploiting artists without compensation.  But I digress.

From the Google Permissionless Innovation Department:

Google Books:  Don’t ask the authors if we can digitize their books, let’s just  monetize search within those books?

YouTube:  Let’s just put all this video content on the web and we’ll deal with the copyright owners later.

Shareholder rights:  Let’s screw virtually everyone but the founders by issuing new  non voting class c stock.  We’ll deal with the SEC and shareholder lawsuits later.

And of course you can apply “permissionless innovation” to many other rogue companies in the web space. After all according to the largely google funded copyleft  file-sharing sites are more innovative than sites like iTunes that seek permission.  That’s why consumers prefer The Pirate Bay to iTunes.  Not because they get stuff for free but because  The Pirate Bay is a pioneer in “permissionless innovation”.

I suppose the ultimate in “permissionless innovation” are the human trafficking sites.  No wonder Google apparently  refuses to restrict the flow of advertising dollars to these sites.  They are fellow “permissionless innovators”.

All sarcasm aside.  This is the problem with Google. It has never grown up.  There is something juvenile and narcissistic about it’s corporate culture. It’s slogan should be “you are not the boss of me”.  They have perverted the concept of internet freedom to mean don’t tell Google what to do ever.  Think I’m exaggerating?

” If we could wave a magic wand and not be subject to US law, that would be great.” —Sergey Brin quoted in The Guardian UK. 

Permissionless Innovation.  We love this phrase.  Do you mind if we Artists For An Ethical Internet keep it?

FarePlay.Org – An Open Letter


Below is an open letter from FarePlay founder Will Buckley – Support FarePlay.
http://fareplay.org/
https://www.facebook.com/FarePlay

An open letter.

FarePlay is an advocacy group supporting the rights of individuals to control the distribution and sale of their Intellectual Property.

Our mission is to confront the misinformation and misperceptions voiced by illegal downloading proponents to justify their actions.

The proponents of online piracy would have you believe that illegal downloading is a victimless crime and they are “entitled” to distribute anyone’s work without permission.  They talk about wealthy super-stars and corporate greed to justify their action and would have you believe that without unrestricted, unlimited free access to copyrighted material no one would be aware of the great music and film that’s out there.

It is time the truth be told by the people whose lives are directly impacted; the creative community.

We need to involve the musicians and filmmakers and empower them to have an open discussion with their fans about the impossible challenges they face when people are unwilling to pay for their music and film.  An online community where artists can communicate with their fans about the importance of fan support without the fear of ridicule and recrimination.

Most importantly, we need to change the conversation.
Will Buckley
founder, FarePlay

CopyLike.Org – Pay Creators Like You Pay Everyone Else

Check out this great organization:
http://copylike.org/
https://www.facebook.com/copylike

It looks like you don’t want to pay
for us to create stuff you like.
Why do you pay everyone else?

Some people think there’s no harm in making illegal copies,
and the price of copies of our work should be zero.

They think only big companies love copyright, using it to do
evil things. That’s only part of the truth.

Copyright begins with the creator. It’s the only weapon
we have to force big companies to negotiate with us, instead of
just ripping us off.

You gave all your money to phone companies, internet service
providers, laptop manufacturers and enormous breweries.

There’s nothing left for us.

Defend Copyright.
It’s All We Have Left.
COPYLIKE.ORG

[ THE 101 ] [NEW BOSS / OLD BOSS ] [ARTISTS KNOW THEY ENEMY] [WALL OF SHAME]

The Wall of Shame Continues: Tell Them If You Do Not Want Your Records and Tours Advertised on Pirate Sites–no @mcdonalds for you

We’ve been posting about advertising on illegal lyric sites and it has become apparent that these sites are pretty clearly direct infringers–meaning they don’t get safe harbors.  This is because all seem to directly copy the lyrics themselves.

It’s also very apparent that the sites are based in China and other locations outside of US law.  Yet–of course–they all prattle on about how they respect the “DMCA” as though US law applied to them wherever they are located and that they are entitled to the “DMCA” safe harbors, which they pretty clearly are not.

Plus, these sites sell a ton of advertising, have referrals for spyware and illegal ring tones, link to artist videos on YouTube,and both the sites and the advertisers free ride off of the brand identity of artists and songwriters whose lyrics are stolen.  This advertising is not only from US companies, but is mostly from Fortune 500 companies like McDonalds, Macy’s, Levi’s and CVS Pharmacies.  Do these companies care so little about artists and songwriters that they are willing to associate their brands with unlicensed lyric sites?

Unfortunately, we have also seen several instances of legitimate artist ads being served to pirate sites such as this Brandi Carlisle ad (below on the right) served to an the Lyrics007.com illegal lyric site.  This ad for Brandi Carlisle’s new album is served next to Maroon 5 lyrics and a click through ad to a spyware toolbar that attracts users with the hope of acquiring more “free” mp3s–and we all know what “free” means.

The Brandi Carlisle ad is served by Google’s “AdChoices” adserving network and we saw many that were served by Doubleclick.  (In case you missed it, “AdChoices” used to be called “Ads by Google” but was changed during the SOPA debate for some unknown reason.)

And the answer to how in the world does a record company’s ad show up on an illegal lyric site probably lies with the adserving network.  That ad network–Google in this case–knows where the ad inventory exists, but won’t tell the advertiser where their brand is being promoted.  So you get these incongruous pairings.

And then there is another legitimate ad for the Warped Tour served next to illegal lyrics for Arcade Fire as well as Google AdChoices sponsored links for Google Chrome and what appears to be a pirate mp3 download application (more likely spyware but we didn’t want to find out) as well as some other bogus looking stuff.

So what can you do as the artist or the artist’s negotiator?  Tell your lawyer or manager that you require in your record deal or tour contract that your name and brand cannot be used in advertising served to illegal sites.  You can even list examples of the sites.  In your tour contract, require that the tour not advertise on pirate sites and give examples.  There may be some advertising networks that are so corrupt that they shouldn’t be used at all.

Don’t stop there–also require that the tour obligate sponsors (or their ad agencies) to not advertise on pirate sites.

Before you throw up your hands and say “forget it, they’ll never agree to that” remember–artists didn’t used to get approval over singles, approval over the use of their music in commercials, or in political ads.   Now it’s pretty routine.

You don’t get if you don’t ask.

[ WHY ARENT MORE MUSICIANS WORKING ] [ ARTISTS FOR AN ETHICAL INTERNET ]

CopyLike.Org – Evil Corporations, We Don’t Like Them!

Check out this Organization:
http://copylike.org/
https://www.facebook.com/copylike

We know that there are
evil corporations in the world.
We don’t like them.

With copyright laws, we get to decide who can use our work,
and how much that have to pay for it.

If we want, we can give it away for free to our favourite charity,
or as a gift to our fans and supporters.

If a company wants our music, we can tell them yes or no.
If they steal it, we can take them to court.

That’s one of the reasons we like copyright.

Defend Copyright.
It’s All We Have Left.
COPYLIKE.ORG

Musicians POV: Songwriters: How to find yourselves on pirate lyric sites and what to do about it

We’ve all heard about Bit Torrent sites like the Pirate Bay, Isohunt, Megavideos.  One kind of site we haven’t heard much about is lyric sites.  These are often large websites with heavy traffic that are text based and advertising supported.

How do you find these sites?  One good way is to search for yourself and your song title on Google.  Google will helpfully deliver you the top illegal lyric sites so you can move right along.  Or you could set up a Google alert for your songs and Google will deliver directly to you the information that they know about already.  Nice and neat package.

Let’s take Lyrics007.com for example.  This is an illegal site that has the lyrics from 1,000s of songs, allows users to create ringtones for “free” (or so they say, we haven’t clicked on those links because who knows what might happen), and lyrics.com is ad supported.

So search for your song in the search box and see if it comes back.  Even if you are not a rock star, you will probably be in the database if you have ever released your lyrics online (like on your own website for example).  When you find your songs, you will notice that your song lyric will be surrounded by advertising.  In the case of Lyrics007.com, it looks like Google has an exclusive on serving advertising to the site, because advertising for Google Play, Google’s music service that had a hard time launching because the music community believed that Google profits from piracy.

You’ll also see a variety of Google ads (hover over the ad and you will see a web address for the ad which will have the name “google” or “doubleclick” in the URL–Google owns Doublclick thanks to the antitrust authoritites).  There will also be ads for “AdChoices” which is also a Google adserving company.  These ads are generating revenue for the ad publisher (Lyrics007) and for Google.  Presumably also for the advertiser, such as McDonalds, Warped Tour and H2O Festival that we saw.

You can find out who is the registrant of the site by searching the WHOIS database at a registry, such as Network Solutions http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/lyrics007.com:

The site is registered to HICHINA ZHICHENG TECHNOLOGY LTD.  In China.  But Lyrics007 is in the top 2500 websites in the US according to Alexa.

So what can you do about this?  Not much.  One thing you can do is take a screen capture of your lyrics and email it to us for the Wall of Shame and we will keep others abreast of what you are finding.  Make sure you get the ads included in the screen shot, but be careful what you click on.

We are particularly interested in screen captures of advertising by big brands (like McDonalds below).  Email them to us and we will post the best ones!

Like this:

Or this:

[ JOHN PERRY BARLOW ] [ HUMAN RIGHTS OF ARTISTS ] [ INFRINGEMENT IS THEFT ]

Artist Exploitation Calculator – Internet Edition

If there is any doubt left in anyone’s mind about the Exploitation Economy ripping off artists, this fantastic website shows the estimated revenue generated for commercial businesses on the backs of artists and creators without paying the artists a single penny.

Stat Show:
http://www.statshow.com/

The Pirate Bay – $14 Million Dollars Annually Estimated
http://www.statshow.com/thepiratebay.se

4 Shared – $11 Million Dollars Annually Estimated
http://www.statshow.com/4shared.com

Iso Hunt – $4 Million Dollars Annually Estimated
http://www.statshow.com/isohunt.com

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg, we also recommend reading:

Artists, Know They Enemy:
https://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/05/artists-know-thy-enemy/

Ethical Fan – Wall Off Shame:
http://ethicalfan.com/2012/04/wall-of-shame-april-2012/

[ WHY ARENT MORE MUSICIANS WORKING ] [ ARTISTS FOR AN ETHICAL INTERNET ]
[ THE SKY IS RISING : MAGIC BEAVER EDITION ] [SF GATE BLUNDERS PIRACY FACTS ]
[ THE 101 ] [NEW BOSS / OLD BOSS ] [ SPOTIFY ] [GROOVESHARK ] [ LARRY LESSIG ]
[ JOHN PERRY BARLOW ] [ HUMAN RIGHTS OF ARTISTS ] [ INFRINGEMENT IS THEFT ]