
Author: Trichordist Editor
@ArtistRights Institute Newsletter 5/5/25
The Artist Rights Watch podcast returns for another season! This week’s episode features Chris Castle on An Artist’s Guide to Record Releases Part 2. Download it here or subscribe wherever you get your audio podcasts.
New Survey for Songwriters: We are surveying songwriters about whether they want to form a certified union. Please fill out our short Survey Monkey confidential survey here! Thanks!
Texas Scalpers Bill of Rights Legislation
Can this Texas House bill help curb high ticket prices? Depends whom you ask (Marcheta Fornoff/KERA News)
Texas lawmakers target ticket fees and resale restrictions in new legislative push (Abigail Velez/CBS Austin)
@ArtistRights Institute opposes Texas Ticketing Legislation the “Scalpers’ Bill of Rights” (Chris Castle/Artist Rights Watch)
Streaming
Spotify’s Earnings Points To A “Catch Up” On Songwriter Royalties At Crb For Royalty Justice (Chris Castle/MusicTechPolicy)
Streaming Is Now Just As Crowded With Ads As Old School TV (Rick Porter/Hollywood Reporter)
Spotify Stock Falls On Music Streamer’s Mixed Q1 Report (Patrick Seitz/Investors Business Daily)
Economy
The Slowdown at Ports Is a Warning of Rough Economic Seas Ahead (Aarian Marshall/Wired)
What To Expect From Wednesday’s Federal Reserve Meeting (Diccon Hyatt/Investopedia)
Spotify Q1 2025 Earnings Call: Daniel Ek Talks Growth, Pricing, Superfan Products, And A Future Where The Platform Could Reach 1bn Subscribers (Murray Stassen/Music Business Worldwide)
Artist Rights and AI
SAG-AFTRA National Board Approves Commercials Contracts That Prevent AI, Digital Replicas Without Consent (JD Knapp/The Wrap)
Generative AI providers see first steps for EU code of practice on content labels (Luca Bertuzzi/Mlex)
| A Judge Says Meta’s AI Copyright Case Is About ‘the Next Taylor Swift’ (Kate Knibbs/Wired) |
Antitrust
Google faces September trial on ad tech antitrust remedies (David Shepardson and Jody Godoy/Reuters)
TikTok
Ireland fines TikTok 530 million euros for sending EU user data to China (Ryan Browne/CNBC)
@ArtistRights Institute opposes Texas Ticketing Legislation the “Scalpers’ Bill of Rights”
By Chris Castle
Coming soon to a state house near you, it looks like the StubHubs and SeatGeeks of this world are at it again. Readers will remember the “Trouble with Ticketing” panel at the Artist Rights Symposium last year and our discussion of the model “Scalpers’ Bill of Rights” that had been introduced at ALEC shortly before the panel convened.
A quick update, the “model” bill was so bad it couldn’t even get support at ALEC, which is saying something. However, the very same bill has shown up and been introduced in both the Texas and North Carolina state legislatures. I posted about it on MusicTechPolicy here.
The Texas House bill (HB 3621) is up for a hearing tomorrow. If you live in Texas you can comment and show up for public comments at the Legislature:
Submit Written Testimony (must be a Texas resident):
• Submit here: https://comments.house.texas.gov/home?c=c473
• Select HB 3621 by Bumgarner
• Keep comments under 3,000 characters
Testify In Person at the Capitol in Austin:
• Hearing Date: Wednesday, April 23 at 8:00 AM CT
• Location: Room E2.014, Texas Capitol
• Register here: https://house.texas.gov/committees/witness-registration
• You must create an account in advance: https://hwrspublicprofile.house.texas.gov/CreateAccount.aspx
ARI has submitted written comments through the Texas House comment portal, but we’re also sending the letter below to the committee so that we can add the color commentary and spin out the whole sordid tale of how this bill came to exist.
Can RICO Be Far Behind? President Trump and Kid Rock Announce Whole of Government Enforcement of the BOTS Act
By Chris Castle
Yes, the sound you hear echoing from Silicon Valley is the sound of gnashing teeth and rending garments—some freaking guitar player did an end run around Big Tech’s brutal lobbying power and got to the President of the United States. Don’t you just hate it when that happens? Maybe not, but trust me, they really hate it because in those dark hours they don’t talk about at parties, they really hate us and think we are beneath them. Remember that when you deal with YouTube and Spotify.
But to no avail. President Trump signed an executive order yesterday that can only be described as taking a whole of government approach to enforcement of the BOTS Act. As readers will recall, I have long said when it comes to StubHub, SeatGeek and their ilk, no bots, no billionaires. It is hard to imagine a world where StubHub & Co. are not basing their entire business model on the use of bots and other automated processes to snarf up tickets before the fans can get them. This was also the subject of our ticketing panel at the 2024 Artist Rights Symposium in Washington, DC.
Remember, the BOTS Act, sponsored by Senator Marsha Blackburn and signed into law by President Obama in 2016, was designed to curb the use of automated software (bots) that purchase large quantities of event tickets, often within seconds of their release, to resell them at inflated prices through market makers like StubHub. It was so under-enforced that until the Executive Order it was entirely possible that StubHub could have sneaked out an IPO to slurp up money from the pubic trough before anyone knows better.
The government’s enforcement of the BOTS Act is so poor that Senator Blackburn found it necessary to introduce even more legislation to try to get the FTC to do their job. The Mitigating Automated Internet Networks for (MAIN) Event Ticketing Act is a bill introduced in 2023 by Senators Blackburn and Ben Ray Luján that aims to give the FTC even fewer excuses not to enforce the BOTS Act. It would further the FTC’s consumer protection mission against IPO-driven ticket scalping.
There are entire business lines built around furthering illegal ticket scalping that are so blatant they actually hold trade shows. For example, NITO complained to the FTC that their investigators found multiple software platforms on the trade show floor at a ticket brokers conference that are illegal under the BOTS Act and possibly under other laws such as Treasury Department regulations, financial crimes, wire fraud and the like.
The NITO FTC complaint details how multiple technology companies, many of whom exhibited at World Ticket Conference hosted by The National Association of Ticket Brokers in Nashville on July 24-26, 2024, provide tools that enable scalpers to circumvent ticket purchasing limits. These tools include sophisticated browser extensions, proxy services, and virtual credit card platforms designed to bypass security measures implemented by primary ticket sellers.
As is mentioned in the Executive Order, the sad truth is that the FTC didn’t take its first action to enforce the 2016 law until 2021. And that’s the only action it has ever taken. Which is why President Trump’s executive order is so critical in stopping these scoundrels.
Kid Rock apparently had a chance to present these issues to President Trump and was present at the signing ceremony for the Executive Order. He said:
First off thank you Mr. President because this has happened at lightning speed. I want to make sure Alina Habba gets her credit too because I know she worked very hard in this but thank you for making this happen so quick.
Anyone who’s bought a concert ticket in the last decade, maybe 20 years, no matter what your politics are knows it is a conundrum. You buy a ticket for $100 but by the time you check out it’s $170. You don’t know what you were charged for, but more importantly these bots come in and get all the good tickets to your favorite shows you want to go to. Then they’re relisted immediately for sometimes a four or five hundred percent markup—the artists don’t get that money!
Ultimately I think this is a great first step. I would love down the road if there be some legislation that we could actually put a cap on the resale of tickets.
Yes, folks, we may be onto something here.
The reason I say that the EO establishes a “whole of government” approach is because of what else is in the order. The actual EO was published, and the press release on the White House site says this:
- The Order directs the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to:
- Work with the Attorney General to ensure that competition laws are appropriately enforced in the concert and entertainment industry.
- Rigorously enforce the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act and promote its enforcement by state consumer protection authorities.
- Ensure price transparency at all stages of the ticket-purchase process, including the secondary ticketing market.
- Evaluate and, if appropriate, take enforcement action to prevent unfair, deceptive, and anti-competitive conduct in the secondary ticketing market.
- The Order directs the Secretary of the Treasury and Attorney General to ensure that ticket scalpers are operating in full compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and other applicable law.
- Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the FTC will also deliver a report within 180 days summarizing actions taken to address the issue of unfair practices in the live concert and entertainment industry and recommend additional regulations or legislation needed to protect consumers in this industry.
In other words, the EO directs other Executive Branch agencies at the DOJ, FTC, Treasury to take enforcement seriously. If the Department of Justice is involved, that could very well lead to enforcement of the BOTS Act’s criminal penalties. And it’s kind of hard to have a StubHub IPO from prison although President Trump may want to add the Securities and Exchange Commission to the list of agencies he is calling into action.
In addition to fines, individuals convicted under the BOTS Act could face imprisonment for up to 1 year for a first offense. Repeat offenders may face longer prison sentences, depending on the nature of the violation and if there are aggravating factors involved (such as fraud or large-scale operations). And remember, wire fraud is a common RICO predicate under the racketeering laws which is where I personally think this whole situation needs to go and go quickly. Remember, StubHub narrowly escaped a claim for civil RICO already.
So we shall see who is serious and who isn’t. But I will say I’m hopeful. If you wanted to seriously go after actually solving the problem on the law enforcement side, this is how you would do it.
If you wanted to go after it on the property rights side, Kid Rock’s line about establishing a cap is how you would start. The guy has clearly thought this through and we’re lucky that he has. We’ll get around to speculative ticketing and taking out some of the other trash down the road if that’s even a problem after getting after bots. But on property rights, let’s start with respecting the artist’s rights to set their own prices and have them followed instead of the current catastrophe.
The other take away from this is that Marsha was right—BOTS Act is probably enough law to handle the problem. You just need to enforce it.
I always say you can’t get Silicon Valley to behave with fines alone because they print money due to the income transfer. Prison, though, prison is the key that picks the lock.
[Editor Charlie sez: This post first appeared on MusicTechPolicy]
@Artist Rights Institute Newsletter 3/31/25

The Artist Rights Institute’s news digest Newsletter from Artist Rights Watch.
New Survey for Songwriters: We are surveying songwriters about whether they want to form a certified union. Please fill out our short Survey Monkey confidential survey here! Thanks!
Ticketing
Executive Order on Combating Unfair Practices in the Live Entertainment Market
Music Industry reacts to Executive Order on Ticket Scalping (Bruce Houghton/Hypebot)
What Hath Trump Wrought: The Effect of the Anti-Scalping Executive Order on StubHub’s IPO (Chris Castle/MusicTech.Solutions)
Copyright Litigation
Merlin sues TikTok rival Triller for breach of contract over allegedly unpaid music licensing fees (Daniel Tencer/Music Business Worldwide)
Artificial Intelligence: Legislation
Artificial intelligence firms should pay artists and musicians for using their work amid uproar over Labour’s plans to exempt them from copyright laws, according to a new poll of Brits (Chris Pollard/Daily Mail)
European Union’s latest draft AI Code of Practice renders copyright ‘meaningless,’ rightsholders warn (Mandy Dalugdug/Music Business Worldwide)
Artificial Intelligence
The Style Returns: Some notes on ChatGPT and Studio Ghibli (Andres Guadamuz/TechnoLlama)
OpenAI’s Preemption Request Highlights State Laws’ Downsides (Oliver Roberts/Bloomberg Law)
Copyright: Termination Rights
Update on Vetter v. Resnik case (Chris Castle/MusicTechPolicy)
Tell Congress to Honor Aretha, Pass #AMFA #IRespectMusic
It’s time.
We join our friends Blake Morgan, #IRespectMusic, SoundExchange, the National Independent Talent Organization (NITO) and many, many others in asking you to join the fight to support artist pay for radio play by passing the American Music Fairness Act. Find out how you can help here, or find your representative in Congress here.

@human_artistry Calls Out AI Voice Cloning
Here’s just one reason why we can’t trust Big Tech for opt out (or really any other security that stops them from doing what they want to do)

@ArtistRights Institute Newsletter 2/24/25: UK @TheIPO Special

The Artist Rights Institute’s news digest Newsletter
UK Intellectual Property Office Copyright and AI Consultation
Artist Rights Institute’s Submission in IPO Consultation
News Media Association “Make it Fair” Campaign at AI Consultation

Artists Protest at IPO Consultation
The Times (Letters to the Editor): Times letters: Protecting UK’s creative copyright against AI
The Telegraph (James Warrington, Dominic Penna): Kate Bush accuses ministers of silencing musicians in copyright row
BBC News (Paul Glynn): Artists release silent album in protest at AI copyright proposals
Reuters (Sam Tabahriti): Musicians release silent album to protest UK’s AI copyright changes
Forbes (Leslie Katz): 1,000-Plus Musicians Drop ‘Silent Album’ To Protest AI Copyright Tweaks
The Daily Mail (Andy Jehring): More than 1,000 musicians including Kate Bash and The Clash release ‘silent album’ to show the impact Labour’s damaging AI plans would have on the music industry
The Guardian (Dan Milmo): Kate Bush and Damon Albarn among 1,000 artists on silent AI protest album
The Guardian (Dan Milmo): Why are creatives fighting UK government AI proposals on copyright?
The Independent (Martyn Landi): Kate Bush and Annie Lennox have released a completely silent album – here’s why
The Evening Standard (Martyn Landi): Musicians protest against AI copyright plans with silent album release
The Independent (Chris Blackhurst): Voices: AI cannot be allowed to thrive at the expense of the UK’s creative industries
The Independent (Holly Evans): UK creative industries launch campaign against AI tech firms’ content use

Silent Album: Is This What We Want Campaign?

More than 1,000 musicians have come together to release Is This What You Want?, an album protesting the UK government’s proposed changes to copyright law.
In late 2024, the UK government proposed changing copyright law to allow artificial intelligence companies to build their products using other people’s copyrighted work – music, artworks, text, and more – without a licence.
The musicians on this album came together to protest this. The album consists of recordings of empty studios and performance spaces, representing the impact we expect the government’s proposals would have on musicians’ livelihoods.
All profits from the album are being donated to the charity Help Musicians.
@ArtistRights Institute Newsletter 2/17/25

The Artist Rights Institute’s news digest Newsletter
#FreeJImmyLai: Update on Chinese Communist Party Free Speech Enemy No. 1: Jimmy Lai, the Hong Kong publisher of Apple Daily
Why case of jailed Briton Jimmy Lai is major sticking point for [UK Prime Minister] Keir Starmer’s relations with China (Sky News/Alix Culbertson)
American Music Fairness Act
@MARSHABLACKBURN, @REPDARRELLISSA, COLLEAGUES REINTRODUCE AMERICAN MUSIC FAIRNESS ACT TO ENSURE ARTIST PAY FOR RADIO PLAY #IRESPECTMUSIC #AMFA (MusicTechPolicy/Editor Charlie)

Copyright Royalty Board
What Must be Done in CRB 5? (MusicTechSolutions/Chris Castle)
Copyright
The MTP Interview: Attorney Tim Kappel and Abby North Discuss Vetter v. Resnick with Chris Castle
First of Its Kind Decision Finds AI Training Is Not Fair Use (Copyright Alliance/Kevin Madigan)
‘Mass theft’: Thousands of artists call for AI art auction to be cancelled. (The Guardian/Dan Milmo)
Artificial Intelligence in China
Featured Translation: China’s most humble profession is being squeezed out by Artificial Challenged Intelligence(ChinaAI/Jeffrey Ding)
Great Power Competition in AI
It’s Not Just Technology: What it Means to be a Global Leader in AI (Just Security/Kayla Blomquist and Keegan McBride)
AI, Great Power Competition & National Security (MIT Press/Daedalus/Eric Schmidt)
AI at a Geopolitical Crossroads: The Tension Between Acceleration and Regulation (US Institute for Peace/Andrew Cheatham)
@Abbie_Llewelyn: UK Government defeated in House of Lords over protecting copyright from AI data scraping
Good news on the AI fight posted by the @artistrights Institute’s ArtistRightsWatch.com]
The Government has been defeated in the Lords over measures to protect creatives from having their copyrighted work used to train AI models without permission or remuneration. [The House of Lords is the “upper chamber” of the UK Parliament, similar to the US Senate.]
Peers [Members of the House of Lords] voted 145 to 126, majority 19, in favour of a package of amendments to the Data (Use and Access) Bill aiming to tackle the unauthorised use of intellectual property by big tech companies scraping data for AI.
Proposing the amendments, digital rights campaigner Baroness Kidron said they would help enforce existing property rights by improving transparency and laying out a redress procedure.
The measures would explicitly subject AI companies to UK copyright law, regardless of where they are based, reveal the names and owners of web crawlers that currently operate anonymously and allow copyright owners to know when, where and how their work is used.


You must be logged in to post a comment.