Just another quick reminder. The Rhapsody(now rebranded Napster) class-action settlement claim portal is open. Songwriters that registered their works with the copyright office and had their work streamed at least once on the service (during the covered period) will receive $35* per work (pro-rated by ownership share). This is many multiples of what the Spotify class action pays out per work.
Further, the Rhapsody class-action settlement, unlike Spotify settlement, also pays on unregistered works. If your unregistered works were streamed at least 10 times during the covered period the self-published songwriter can claim $1* per work.
I’ve looked at catalogues of a number of small indie publishers and songwriters that will likely receive several thousand dollars. This is real money. The settlement closes 12-31-2019.
A “Theodore Kaczynski” from Lincoln Montana signs a Google-funded astroturf petition over and over again.
Google-funded and affiliated astroturfs have mounted a spambot campaign targeting Senators to vote against the CASE Act. The CASE Act (voluntary small claims copyright court) passed the house 410-6. Google and their allies are worried because independent artists and creators might now have a decent shot at enforcing their copyright. Corporate backed astroturfs first mounted a wild disinformation campaign against the CASE Act. See this blog here.
When that didn’t work they launched a series of easily automated web forms designed to deluge Senators with emails, tweets, facebook posts, phone calls, and messages on the senator’s websites. As we saw with the FCC Net Neutrality battle, these forms leave us with tons of fake comments. According to Pew Research, 94% of the 22 million comments to FCC on Net Neutrality were identical to hundreds, thousands, even millions of other emails. Spambots are screwing with our democracy. How can our representatives hear what their constituents really think if they are deluged with spam?
As has always been the case, best we can do is call our Senators (and don’t use a script.)
However, in the meantime anytime you find one of these forms below? Maybe replace the canned message with a message that lets the Senator’s office know it’s simply a Spambot from one of these Astroturfs. You don’t have to lie about anything. Use your real name. Tell em it’s spam. Make the Spambots the issue. Eventually, maybe these astroturf will stop using these forms if every Senator knows they are spam, and we can go back to our old only partially dysfunctional democracy.
Every web form I’ve found are curiously defective in the same way: you can usually refresh the page and sign, email, tweet, call with the same message over and over again. At top of this blog, I take one of these bullshit petitions and have Ted Kaczynski sign it over and over again leaving the exact same comment each time. Hope you enjoy.
Scientists have concluded the Senator’s official photo likely violates the Myspace Rule: profile photos may not be older than (Current Age/10) – 1 year.
We are reprinting this article because once again Wyden is siding with Silicon Valley rather than his own Oregon constituents. #PrimaryWyden2022
The longtime democratic Senator loves to boast about his progressive bona fides but when you look at his legislative record a different story is told. Sure he’s progressive on social issues but on everything else? He appears to be in the pocket of monied Silicon Valley interests, broadcasters and hedge funds. For our readers, the key issue is Wyden reliably supports legislation and policies that enrich anti-union right-wing billionaires and impoverishes union performers and songwriters.
Examples
IRFA or (the Orwellian named) Internet Radio Fairness Act. This was his bill. It would have slashed digital radio royalties to (largely union) performers as much as 70 percent. The beneficiaries? The Silicon Valley VCs backing all these digital broadcasters. Fortunately, the bill was withdrawn. What kind of “progressive” tries to pass a law that slashes wages to workers while enriching a cartel of mostly right-wing billionaires? Disgusting right?
Not convinced? How bout the recently passed Music Modernization Act? Parts of the bill were controversial, but not title II the so-called “Classics Act.” The Classics Act restored digital royalties to pre-1972 performers. Wyden was the lone senator who opposed the Classics Act.
A little background. In 2012 digital broadcasters in apparent coordination (Hello FTC? Is this thing on?) stopped paying royalties to performers who had the misfortune of recording before 1972. The justification the digital broadcasters used was a tortured interpretation of how the 1976 copyright act and a 1995 amendment interacted. In short an unintended highly questionable loophole.
However, the loophole provided a significant break to digital broadcasters. Some estimate the broadcasters got a 15% reduction in what they would have paid out to artists.
Why on earth would a “progressive” Senator support what is essentially a vast transfer of wealth from largely union performers to mostly right-wing billionaires?
(Update 10/30/2019): Now Wyden is opposing the CASE Act. A small claims copyright court that would allow small creators (i.e. Portland indie musicians, photographers and filmmakers) to do something about massive copyright infringement by major platforms. Without the CASE Act, the only option for small creators is to go into federal court. Not many of them have the $100,000 it takes to even mount a case. This has made it so only the biggest media companies can successfully enforce copyrights. The clear consequence is this is anti-competitive and has been driving the consolidation in the music business. Maybe that’s why Wyden opposes the Case Act. He never met a megacorp he didn’t like.
In this age of fake everything, Wyden is the fakest of all progressives.
Now consider Wyden represents the City of Portland and your head may begin to spin.
Portland has come to rival Nashville and Austin for its music economy. Portland produces groundbreaking new bands each year and is also home to many musical innovators from earlier generations. It’s also home to many labels and CD Baby the commercial heart of the DIY music industry. There are likely tens of thousands of folks employed by Portland’s music economic cluster.
On the other hand Silicon Valley has a cluster of Silicon Valley server farms out in the remote Eastern Oregon high desert. Oregon taxpayers subsidize these low employee operations (500 jobs statewide?) through tax subsidies and perhaps most importantly low-cost hydroelectric power from the Columbia River.
Every subsidized low-cost megawatt the Silicon Valley lampreys suck-up is a megawatt that Oregon taxpayers have to source from higher cost higher carbon sources. Does that sound like the kind of policy that benefits Wyden’s constituents or Silicon Valley billionaires?
Oregonians deserve better than the false progressive Senator Wyden.
It’s not too early to think about primarying the Silicon Valley apparatchik. 2022 is not far away. And who knows it could be even sooner…No one has ever really delved into the curious story that Wyden’s son started a “hedge fund” in his father’s Washington DC basement. Who gave junior the startup money? He started the fund immediately after leaving a financial firm owned by one of Wyden’s most prominent donors. Hmm. That smell like pay to play to you? It’s strange enough it deserves some real scrutiny.
Congratulations to Sen Ron Wyden: 2019 Artist Enemy #3
We just learned this morning that Ron Wyden has put a hold on the CASE Act. It passed the house 410-6 but one Senator, a fairly sleazy one at that is gonna block a bill that would level playing field between silicon valley and small and independent musicians. the Senator with all those Portland ratepayer-subsidized Google server farms out in the high desert is gonna screw over all those Portland musicians again. Imagine that? Essentially making musicians subsidize Google not once but twice. Maybe that’s the way the anti-worker “Nike progressive” rolls but Oregon deserves better. Symbolic lip service to progressive causes but when it comes to the little guy? He’s firmly on the side of big business. Wyden has voted 100% with Google on internet policy. He is so pro-Silicon Valley he was the only Senator to vote against the FOSTA the anti-internet sex trafficking bill. Who the hell is doesn’t want to stop internet sex trafficking? Wyden. The guy is a bum. We are going re-run articles all this week detailing his sleazy corporate connections. Let’s start with who would make a better senator to represent Oregon.
6 Oregon Musicians That Would Make a Better Senator than Ron Wyden (And never had hedge fund in the basement).
Reprint 7 22 2018
Senator Ron Wyden doesn’t seem to understand that he represents a state with a very dynamic music scene. Over the last two decades Portland, the state’s largest city has become arguably the most dynamic music scene in the entire country. Yet Wyden has twice now thrown songwriters and performers under the bus, in order to protect a few tech billionaires from California. Yes these billionaires happen to have server farms out in eastern Oregon but these server farms at most employ a few hundred folks. Portland OR alone has thousands of professional musicians.
But it’s not just that Wyden doesn’t understand this, or has forgotten about those musicians in his state. He is actively hostile to their interests. Check it.
First in 2013 Wyden introduced the Orwellian “Internet Radio Fairness Act.” This bill would have created “fairness” for internet radio by slashing performer and songwriter pay as much as 70%. It also placed extraordinary restraints on speech of songwriters and performers, threatening prosecution for any group of songwriters or performers that discussed digital licenses and rates with their colleagues. The language of the bill was so broad and regressive it would have punished members of a single band that collectively blogged negatively about bad digital licensing deals. We are not making this up. The congressional research office eventually stepped in because the bill was so bad. Under withering criticism Wyden abandoned the bill.
But now Wyden has taken it up a notch. According to rules of the US Senate a single senator can put a hold on a bill. Despite the fact the House of Representatives passed the Music Modernization Act 415-0 Wyden intends to put a hold on a consensus bill. What an egomaniac. To put this into perspective the Dec 8th 1941 declaration of war on Japan and Germany was not unanimous. The Music Modernization Act enjoys more consensus than WWII! But Wyden intends to stand in the way.
But it’s even worse. When you drill down into Wyden objects to what is perhaps the least controversial part of the bill. The part of the bill that extends digital royalties to performers that recorded before 1972. This “pre-1972 loophole” in digital royalties is pretty much a copyright law typo. Surely the authors of the 1995 act that formalized digital public performance royalties did not intend to exclude pre-1972 performers. Indeed until 2013 most digital services paid royalties to pre-1972 performers. It wasn’t until Wyden’s first bill was shot down that Pandora, Sirius and other digital services began to aggressively exploit the loophole. Coincidence? Maybe. But I think not.
This is skullduggery of the highest order. Now consider who is one of the biggest beneficiaries of this loophole: Google/YouTube.
As previously noted Google along with all the other Silicon Valley firms have large server farms out in Eastern Oregon. And Wyden is eyeball deep in Silicon Valley politics.
As a recent commenter on this blog put it:
Ron Wyden, got his political start as a fairly conservative Democrat, which was necessary for his initial success because outside the Portland metropolitan area (and Eugene of course), the other two-thirds of Oregon’s population is very conservative.
Oregon has always had a boom or bust economy based on agriculture or dwindling natural resources, and pretty much every politician of every skunk stripe collectively bent over and grabbed ankles when the tech sector unbelted and began plowing the “Silicon Forest” with their plastic thingies and their ones and zeros. As you might expect, Google now owns Oregon. QED.
Pretty much all you need to know about Wyden is that he is on the Intelligence Committee. You don’t even approach that gig unless you have been drinking the Kool-Aid for donkey’s years. – Ron or Donna
And indeed our reader is spot on. Oregon politicians have been especially pliant when it comes to Google. The Oregonian estimates that Oregon politicians have given Google tax breaks for a single data center in The Dalles worth $100 million dollars. The data center has less than 200 employees. That works out to $500,000 a job. On top of that the data centers suck down most of the cheap hydro power that should arguably go to rate payers in Oregon. Seems pretty weird, right? Oregon enriching a bunch of California based companies for a handful of jobs? Someone somewhere must be making a lot of money on the deal.
Also consider this. Who do you think has oversight over those federal hydropower rates? The rates the operators of those data centers pay? If you guessed The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources you would be correct. And who might be on that committee? Ron Wyden.
The presence of these large data centers is a net negative to the citizens of Oregon. So why does Ron Wyden feel obliged to do the bidding of Google on a music bill? Whether it’s ignorance or greed the result is the same. Ron Wyden sucks at representing citizens of Oregon. Sure he pleases many Oregon residents when he goes after the trump administration, but surely there are plenty of other progressive democratic politicians in Oregon that would do the same without icky pro-Google Silicon Valley shillery.
Then there is also the matter of the senators adult son, Andrew Wyden, and his “hedge fund” ADW Capital. The one man hedge fund was started it in the Senators Washington DC townhouse in 2011. Andrew Wyden had just graduated from college and someone gave him 3 million dollars to start a basement hedge fund. If the initial 3 million in funds came from campaign donors (specifically longtime Wyden supporter D. E. Shaw) or other investors with business before the senate you could be looking at an FBI investigation.
Even if the senator is clean, the optics are horrible. And it’s extremely poor judgement on the part of the senator. If there turns out to be anything to this story it’s entirely possible that Oregon may be looking for a new Senator before his term is up.
So it’s not a joke to start considering who might replace Wyden in the Senate. Given the growing importance of music to the Oregon economy (surely music is responsible for 100 times the number of jobs that Google data centers created) I humbly suggest Oregon voters look at some smart entrepreneurial musicians to replace Wyden. I believe there are probably a number of Oregon musicians that would do a much better job of representing Oregon in the US Senate.
I asked this question on twitter and here are some of the suggestions:
Well the entire band can’t be Senator, but I suppose Chris like most people is thinking of Carrie Brownstein for her role in Portlandia. Face and name recognition. We have to assume the campaign videos would be funny. Does she still live in Portland? Well regardless state residency didn’t stop Cheney from running for Vice President. Regardless I wouldn’t discount Drummer Janet Weiss (also of Quasi). Secret weapon. Corin Tucker also a solid choice.
Again not sure he’s in Portland proper. I believe he still lives just across the state line in Washington. I always see him in shows in Portland so he’s certainly close. Again Cheney demonstrated it’s easy enough to move. And Krist does have a keen interest in politics. In 2004 considered a run for Lt Governor of Washington. He is also the author of Of Grunge and Government: Let’s Fix This Broken Democracy.
— Camper Van Beethoven (@CamperBeethoven) July 22, 2018
Larry Crane, musician, engineer, producer, music entrepreneur and Tape Op magazine editor. This is my personal vote. Anyone that has had any experience in the studio knows that producing and engineering requires great diplomatic skills. Producing and engineering of a record requires forging grand compromises between many strong personalities and interest groups: labels, managers, and the performers themselves who are often internally conflicted. It’s a tough job Larry but your state needs you!
I always forget Patterson Hood lives in Portland now. Hood hails from the deep red state of Alabama. Yet he is a strong democrat. Patterson and his band Drive-by Truckers have deftly managed to embrace progressive causes (r.g. Black Lives Matter) w/o alienating the portion of their audience that identifies with conservatives. Who else to better bridge the divide between Portland’s urban population and deep red rural parts of the state. Also he is an extremely humble guy and would never even consider a senate run. All the more reason to send Mr. Hood to Washington.
Yes indeed. If Mr Matthews simply remained in his cabin in the woods making recordings and never went to DC for a single day, Oregon residents would surely be better off than sending Wyden back to DC.
Please suggest more Oregon Musicians in comments and we will add them to the poll.
We’ve been covering all week two Google-funded astroturfs, Public Knowledge and EFF, and their efforts to spam The Senate with automated tweets, emails, comments, and phone calls in hopes of blocking the CASE Act (voluntary small claims court for copyright).
As we dug into this, we started focusing on Public Knowledge and their tweetbot. While experimenting with the tweetbot, I discovered it took total control of my twitter account. Like completely. It basically makes your twitter account part of a botnet that is controlled by Public Knowledge or their agent Phone2Action. Look at the permissions it asks for:
But even stranger (or maybe not), shortly after authorizing permissions, I noticed unfamiliar devices logging into my account.
See screengrab above. I was nowhere near Scaggsville MD. I don’t know that it was Phone2Action, but I’ve never seen this sort of activity on my accounts. I’m pretty security conscious.
Particularly funny (or outrageous) since besides being copyright skeptics Public Knowledge claim to be privacy advocates. That is obviously bullshit.
Phone2Action is the maker of the above tweetbot. Phone2Action website says:
“In the United States, everyone’s voice counts. The opportunity for civil discourse is what makes our country a model for democracies everywhere. When we have problems, we don’t look the other way—we try to solve them. We built Phone2Action to empower the problem-solver and advocate that lives in everyone. Our tools amplify the voices of movements through technology in order to effect change.” (emphasis added)
Alright, that sounds neat. I mean amplify sounds like a little more than one vote per person, but otherwise it seems cool. Phone2 Action was founded by two democrats. One married to a former Obama administration official. The third founder seems to be independent but was in the US Digital Service an Obama initiative. So Phone2Action seems generally progressive outfit. And if you look at their webpage front and center they have some non-profits, corporate responsibility efforts, and commercial campaigns by vaguely virtuous companies like Patagonia and Ben and Jerry’s.
But if you dig a little deeper, into the case studies, it’s not long before you find Satan’s cobbler-er, oops I mean the Internet Association. There is also mention of a Net Neutrality campaign, although that seems to be downplayed. Probably because the net neutrality campaign devolved into the mother of all bot-fueled fake public comment disasters. 22 million comments, with reports of half of them being fake. From an NPR article:
The Pew Research Center took a close look at the comments. Associate Director Aaron Smith said several things popped out. Maybe the biggest, 94 percent of the comments “were submitted multiple times, and in some cases those comments were submitted many hundreds of thousands of times.”
The Net Neutrality fake comment scandal has even become the focus of a US Senate investigations. See here.
Is this starting sound like the massive spamming of the EU Parliament that happened with the EU Copyright Directive (N-Square, SaveYourInternet.eu, EDRi, Open Media and New/Mode)? Yes, and we will come back to that probably later this week. Something else caught my eye. This article by the Consumer Technology Association (aka CEA) Chairman Gary Shapiro.
Whoa. Shapiro is basically bragging about the CEA and Phone2Action together breaking a union work slowdown by the longshoremen. Have you ever met a longshoreman? While the CEA is your usual anti-worker corporate trade group, it seems pretty weird that Phone2Action with its progressive Obama credentials would get involved in strikebreaking.
Now check this out:
“CEA, with support from over 200,000 Innovation Movement members who help us advocate for smart tech policies and several key industry stakeholders, effectively shared the urgency of the West Coast ports crisis via social media, asking Congress and the White House to help keep our ports open for business,” CEA CEO and President, Gary Shapiro, said.
This is a picture of Gary Shapiro. You think this dude leads an auxiliary of a boring-ass trade group that has 200,000 active members? This guy is clearly not a whirling dervish of raw charisma. 200,000 members? Yeah right. And the Innovation Movement? I didn’t believe it so I looked it up. Well there once was a website for the Innovation movement.
But as far as I can tell by 2015, at the time of the longshoreman slowdown, the website hadn’t been active for two years. By 2017 the site redirected to a domain reseller. I know a thing or two about grassroots organizing, and if you have 200,000 active members helping you lobby Congress you don’t let the website domain around which you organize expire. That is seriously valuable real estate. Keep your members. Keep them engaged.
So clearly I don’t think they ever had 200,000 members. My hunch is that they had a few thousand members and then a bunch of fake email addresses and sock puppet social media accounts. I could be wrong. I’m not saying CEA or Shapiro had any idea they were fake… well maybe I am saying that, otherwise, why would he let the domain expire? Aw shit, I don’t know. Politics plus the internet is such a shitshow. Anything seems possible now. But there is no way there were 200,000 real members.
Just let me say this. I hope I’m wrong. Cause otherwise Shapiro and Phone2Action ran a spam op and tricked The President of The United States into intervening in a labor dispute. I hope I’m wrong. I don’t want to believe the worst about our democracy. Cause if I’m right we are screwed.
Public Knowledge’s canned message Tweetbot completely takes over your twitter account. How is this any different than a botnet?
Many of you are familiar with Public Knowledge for their general hostility towards copyright and the rights of authors. In particular, they are currently opposing the CASE Act which would finally give artists a small claims alternative to federal court. Most independent artists do not have the $100,000+ it takes to pursue a case in federal court. The court is voluntary, both parties have to agree to use the small claims copyright court. No one is forced into this system. It’s good for the claimant and the party accused of infringement. By all measures, this is a simple commonsense solution. And an overwhelming bipartisan consensus agrees in congress agrees. The Case Act recently passed in the house 410-6. Stunning!
The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration. Of course, Public Knowledge (Google-funded) doesn’t want the CASE Act to pass. So they have attempted to mount a “cyberturf” campaign directed at Senators using some sketchy social media and phone bots. This tweet bot distributes canned messages that are factually incorrect. Hostile foreign governments need not mount disinformation campaigns against our democratic institutions as we’ve already got Google astroturfs on the job!
In particular, Public Knowledge is distributing a tool that combines a “tweetbot” and “patch through calling.” The tweetbot is easy to understand. The patch through calling requires a little digging to understand how it could be (is intended to be?) abused. It doesn’t really provide any extra convenience to an individual activist. Any activist can look up their Senator’s office on iPhone and click on the telephone number. Whereas, for instance, if you have a boiler room full of paid activists, a third party could easily direct a firehose of phone calls at a wavering Senator, and the calls would be untraceable, the Senatorial staff would not realize it was the same group of paid activists calling over and over. It is my strong suspicion this is the point of these “patch through” phone bots. This is not far-fetched as something similar seems to have played out last summer in the EU parliament.
So I spent the last few days playing around with the “tools” provided by Public Knowledge (and EFF tools). The Public Knowledge tools were the most interesting. Perhaps horrifying is a better description. I came to three extraordinary conclusions:
First. In order to use Public Knowledges tweetbot, you have give total control of your twitter account to Public Knowledge’s contracted agent a company called Phone2Action. The permissions literally let the Public Knowledge and Phone2Action do anything with your account. It is as if you have joined a botnet. (See screenshot at top of article)
Second. Public Knowledge Tweetbot allows you to customize your message to Senators (above). But it also will tweet their canned message back to your followers (Below) WTF? This has got to be illegal. It’s forcing me to make speech that I would never make. It’s an unauthorized appropriation of my pubic persona to involuntarily endorse something I don’t want to endorse. What else is this bot doing in my name?
Third. After observing the tweetbot in action for a while, I went to revoke the Twitter permissions I had granted to Public Knowledge (Phone2Action). I noticed something unusual. Under twitter’s “apps and permissions” I saw an iPhone I did not recognize using my twitter account. See screenshot below.
Twitter was identifying this phone as being in Cedar Rapids IA. This seemed very strange. It was not my iPhone. Was not on airport Wifi and my phone IP address indicated my true location. (Not Cedar Rapids). I was not using a VPN. Bizarre. I logged this iPhone out of my twitter account as well as every other device using omy twitter account.* In the confusion, I forgot to disable the PublicKnowlege/Phone2Action permissions.
About an hour later I remembered I hadn’t revoked permissions. I checked my account and I saw that there were two new Ipads logged into my twitter account. WTF? One reported its location as Scaggsville MD, which is just outside the beltway in Maryland. I was hundreds of miles from that location. I have since disabled the permissions I gave to Public Knowledge/Phone2Action.
There have since been no unusual logins on my twitter account. I have no idea if this tweetbot had anything to do with these mysterious logins. But I have never seen anything like it before. On this third issue, I’m not placing the blame on Public Knowledge. But I’m having a hard time coming up with an explanation here.
*21 twitter sessions? Yes, I have a lot of computers. And many of them are running programs that monitor twitter and other social media for certain patterns and keywords. It’s part of other research I hope to publish one day.
Don’t believe the headlines–just because there’s no money for artists from the PledgeMusic bankruptcy does not mean that the story is over. It just means that justice is going to take longer. If you were paying attention, it should have been obvious from the beginning that PledgeMusic was a financial roach motel–the money goes in but doesn’t come out.
In the least suspenseful story of the decade if not longer, it appears that PledgeMusic’s officers and directors ran the company straight into the ground. It’s unclear from the Official Receiver’s report (which is available here) whether Pledge had any cash on hand when it filed for liquidation. The Official Receiver appears to value the company’s intellectual property at £20,000 as its only asset. Pledge had £7.4 million in “debt” so nothing for the artists or anyone else.
However, the really important part of the Official ReceiverReceiver’s report relates to the officers and directors.
So unpacking that paragraph, the directors seek to avoid liability by saying they weren’t involved with the “day to day running of the company”. Well, no kidding. That’s why they are directors. But they are answering a question that isn’t relevant. The question is not whether they were involved with the day to day, the question is what did they know about the company’s insolvency and when did they know it? A related question is whether they were willfully blind about the financial condition of the company?
It is difficult to understand how they couldn’t have known about the company’s financial condition. This is not something you find out from interviewing Benji Rogers. This is something you find out by examining board minutes, financial statements, internal accounting, and of course internal emails.
It must be said, of course, that stating that “the company continued to operate as previously” begs the question “previously” to what date? And of course, if it continued to operate as an insolvent, that doesn’t really help them. At all.
Let’s not forget that to a large degree, once the board becomes aware that their company is insolvent, their fiduciary duty shifts from the shareholders to the creditors, especially if the board fails to disclose the insolvency to creditors and fails to seek bankruptcy protection (which goes by different names in the UK, administration or liquidation).
And that last sentence is also telling. Why did the board seek legal advice about whether the pledge monies were or were not trust monies? Again, answering a question that wasn’t asked exactly. Who gave them this advice, what prompted the board to ask for it, when did they ask for it and what happened after they got the advice? Did the lawyer also tell the board that they could tell the public they were soliciting funds for one purpose and then use the money for an entirely different purpose for their or the company’s own benefit?
You see, it doesn’t really matter whether the monies were held in trust if the entire process was a fraud. But I’d still like to hear from that lawyer as to exactly what he or she told them–I seriously doubt that it’s quite as broad as all that.
But here is the punchline of the Official Receiver’s report:
It does not sound to me like the Official Receiver (the liquidator) views her work as completed. What it appears remains to be determined now is whether the cause of the insolvency (or bankruptcy) requires further action, including a referral by the Official Receiver to Scotland Yard and/or the Crown Prosecution Service (which is essentially the prosecution arm of the Home Office–the people with the white wigs for the BBC watchers).
Artists should feel free to call the Official Receiver at the number they gave or I believe you can still email to LondonB.OR@insolvency.gov.uk using the matter LQD5671373 in the subject.
This EFF form allows anyone anywhere to repeatedly call Senators from this webform, no identification, no email, phone or geolocation verification. Pure cyberturfing. BTW the “tens of thousands of dollars” is false. Also not mentioned: CASE ACT is a voluntary small claims court for copyright claims. Explicit opt-in process. No one is “on the hook” for anything.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
It’s deja vu all over again. Looks like Google-funded astroturf groups EFF and Public Knowledge are using the same questionable tactics that Google affiliated astroturfs used in the EU to try to defeat the Copyright Directive. Spambots, Tweetbots, and automated calls.
If you’re not familiar with what happened in Europe here’s a very brief summary:
EU parliament proposed some copyright changes that required digital platforms like Facebook and Youtube to do a better job policing their platforms for copyright infringement. Naturally, Google did what they always do and mounted what can only be described as a massive disinformation campaign against the proposed copyright changes. Most of this took the form of angry emails, phone calls and tweets to EU parliamentarians. And at first it worked. In July 2018 cowed MEP (Members of European Parliament) voted against a sort of fast track approach to legislation. This blog noted some very non-organic patterns in the emails, tweets and automated calls (example tweets to Spanish MEPs stayed at a constant frequency in the overnight hours). Further, this blog noted the financial connections between the groups running the campaign and Google. Eventually, the Times of London and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung became aware of this and ran high profile stories detailing the entire fiasco.
The good news is this, EU parliamentarians were so outraged when these tactics were exposed, support for the Copyright Directive dramatically increased and eventually passed.
Now Google-funded groups like EFF and Public Knowledge are using the same tactics in hopes of creating the appearance of a fake grassroots uprising.
Here Public Knowledge is pushing the same call spamming tool as above. The difference here I was able to “repurpose” the spam tool to connect to the Public Knowlege office (Hey, it was research!). When I tried it on my own number I was able to make about 3 calls a minute. It would be possible to harass the shit out of anyone with this tool. It’s like leaving a loaded phone DDOS gun around for anyone to use. I do not believe that this is a bug or defect. I think that this is the intention of putting these tools out there. They hope the angry internet-paranoids will abuse these tools. Just like they did in the EU. Otherwise, why not just provide a phone number to call? Type in your address and your senator’s phone number appears. Take out your phone and dial the number. Or Why make the call come from a webtool on the Actnow.io server? I say it’s cause it is easily hackable and automatable. Fuck these groups. Both are objective dangers to our democracy.
There are also tools available for emailing and tweeting your Senator. I was able to fire off tweets at about a dozen a minute. I changed the text to alert the Senators this was a demonstration. Can you imagine what 20 sock puppet accounts could do? Swamp all hundred Senators in a few minutes! Again no geolocation verification. I could be in Tehran, Belarus, Davos or Mountain View. No need to be in US!
They are even providing tools for leaving comments on official government websites of Senators. Pretty sure that I read somewhere that there are regulations that forbid the use of automation to leave comments on most federal govt websites. Maybe someone can point me to the text? In the meantime you can always repurpose the tools to spread the truth about these folks.
I still don’t have all the details on this. But as the House prepares to vote on the CASE Act (voluntary small claims copyright court option for creators and users) it appears that EFF, ACLU and others have started a Robocall and spambot campaign against the bill.
The webforms are here and I have confirmed they are easily automatable. Even from a smartphone.
Use the forms against the tech monopolies. Flip the script, make pro Case Act calls. Put your own pro Case act text in email forms.
MRI (Music Reports Inc) is a company that collects and licenses royalties on behalf of songwriters and publishers. They also act as a licensing agent for digital services. That is, like HFA they work both sides of the digital music market. Personally, I think these sorts of arrangements present some competition and conflict of interest problems. And eventually, those problems will emerge. As a frequent investor in startups, I don’t invest in companies like this. But that’s just me. Other folks like to make money by seeking out and exploiting legal loopholes.
So MRI’s appearance on both sides of the streaming music marketplace raises eyebrows. But to be clear that is not illegal. However, I’ve never seen anything quite like this: MRI is the DMCA Agent for TikTok! That means a company that is supposed to be licensing artists and rightsholders work is aiding and abetting a massive infringer (TikTok*) in a whac-a-mole DMCA scam.
And I do mean scam. Like highly misleading. Bordering on fraudulent. Here’s why. As I detailed in my last blog, I don’t think TikTok qualifies for the DMCA safe harbor on much of the infringing activity that occurs on TikTok. Here is the quick summary:
After a couple of hours messing around with app it appears:
TikTok makes available my work and then provides the copy to the user before the user makes any content.
The copy would seem to be more than “ephemeral” (an important copyright act legal distinction) as at certain stages I can repeatedly access the content even when my device lacked internet connectivity.
TikTok app “marries” or “syncs” the music to audiovisual content provided by their service or uploaded by the user. Note this is after the recording and composition have apparently been copied and distributed to the user’s device. In other words, the infringement occurs before user publishes content.
Before the “marrying” or “syncing” of the music to audiovisual content I cut off internet connectivity. The process of marrying video to music failed. This suggests TikTok service requires sync license, not the user.
Only after all sync has occurred does user have the option to “publish” the work. This is long after many activities requiring licenses, and thus infringement has occurred.
DMCA safe harbor provides the digital service protection from its user’s copyright infringement. Not infringement committed by the digital service. Grooveshark made this mistake and was promptly put out of business.
I’m saying it appears something similar happens with the TikTok app. So if in fact, I’m right, that would imply MRI by operating TikTok’s DMCA safe harbor operation they are helping to perpetrate a fraud.
Finally I would like MRI explain to its songwriters and publishers, why it is helping TikTok intimidate songwriters and publishers into NOT filing a DMCA notice. It’s right on the TikTok website. TikTok basically says they will doxx songwriters and publishers if you file a copyright complaint. And where will they get those complaints? From MRI.
This is yet another example of why my focus of this blog has switched from investigating civil abuses of artists and rightsholder to investigating criminal abuse. My hashtag for the year is: #PutADigitalMusicExecutiveInJail2020. Why? it’s the only thing that will ever stop the abuse.
*TikTok is a massive infringer. No public performance licenses. Few if any “mechanical” licenses. My work has been used and as far as I can tell, there are no licenses, nor have roylaties been paid. To pretend that TikTok is largely licensed service is objective fiction.
The Trichordist 
You must be logged in to post a comment.