The Trichordist

Artists For An Ethical and Sustainable Internet #StopArtistExploitation

Main menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • additional documents
  • || About ||
    • || The 101: Essential Reading (FAQ) ||
      • || Comment Policy and Copyright ||
  • || Videos ||
  • || Practical Knowledge ||
  • || Submit A Story ||
  • || International Translations ||
  • || Advocacy Updates ||

Search

  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Tag Archives: Section 115

December 12, 2012

Songwriter comments on Section 115 Rulemaking

We’ve been reviewing the comments posted on the Copyright Office website regarding the accounting regulations for Section 115.  We are humbled that so many of you used our post as a guideline for your own comments, and we learned a lot from all of you.  Thank you. Thank you for your thoughts and thank you for helping to take ownership of our future.

We thought you might be interested in reading comments from Lisa Thomas Music Services (publisher for independent songwriter/recording artists such as Don Henley and Glenn Frey of the Eagles, Randy Newman, Janet Jackson, Walter Becker of Steely Dan, Ray D. Parker, Jr., Mary Chapin Carpenter and Bonnie Raitt, among others), songwriters Danny O’Keefe , Michelle Shocked, Don Coyer, and Bob Regan as well as David’s comment.  All of these songwriter’s thoughtful comments are part of the public record now and are up on the Copyright Office site, but we’ll reproduce David’s comment here:

December 10, 2012

Tanya M. Sandros
Deputy General Counsel
U.S. Copyright Office
101 Independence Ave. S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20559-6000

Re:  In the Matter of the Mechanical and Digital Phonorecord Delivery Compulsory License, Proposed Regulations for Reporting Monthly and Annual Statements of Account for the making and distribution of phonorecords, Docket No. 2012-7

Dear Ms. Sandros:

I am David Lowery and I founded the bands Cracker and Camper Van Beethovan.  I am also an instructor in the Music Business Program at the University of Georgia at Athens.  I am writing to you regarding the proposed regulations for statutory licenses for mechanical royalties.  These views are my own and should not be attributed to anyone else.

Other comments will address each of the proposed regulations, but I wanted to give you some general thoughts based on my experiences as a songwriter and music publisher.  I want to emphasize that I am all for making music licensing easier, but am concerned that the Copyright Office get a clear picture of what it’s like for songwriters, especially independent songwriters, to live with the laws you make.

1. No Audit: As a songwriter, I have no idea whether I am being paid correctly by any digital service and I am not allowed to audit them.  As far as I know, no digital service complies with the rules anyway, so it almost doesn’t matter whether the Copyright Office keeps them the same or changes the rules.  This is untenable.  When I gave a mechanical license to my record company, I could always audit the label’s mechanical royalty accountings if I chose to do so.  Let’s be clear—the new boss is way worse than the old boss.  If statements from digital services could be at least as bad as record company accountings, it would be a major step forward.

Respectfully, I would suggest that the Copyright Office should be working especially hard to provide songwriters with a good analog for a royalty audit.

2. Bait and Switch: I routinely receive a “notice of intention to use” my work that is always late. This violates the basic rule of statutory licensing. The “NOI” I receive often comes with a letter asking me to log into a website to see if I am owed money by the digital service or how much I am owed. When I go to the website I am asked to “sign” a click through agreement that makes significant changes to the few statutory rights I have. This is the worst kind of trickery and is worse than the worst direct mail campaigns because I can always throw away the junk mail. This trickery involves my life’s work and I’d rather not throw it away.

I respectfully suggest that the Copyright Office should expressly prohibit anyone who uses the statutory license from further burdening songwriters by trying to trick them into a click through agreement that makes them give up the rights the songwriter is entitled to under the Copyright Act.

3.  Minimum Amount for Payment:  Digital services sometimes issue a check for one penny along with the bait and switch trick license—yes, $0.01.  I have no idea why they send a penny check, but I assume it has something to do with proving they paid for the rights they get in their click agreement.  I also understand from songwriter friends that it is pretty common to get penny checks.  So if these services can send a penny check when it benefits them, then why do I have to wait to earn $50 before I get paid?  And what about the bait and switch technique is supposed to give me confidence that these services will ever pay my $50 and how would I ever know what my earnings were if I can’t audit?

I would respectfully point out to the Copyright Office that these services chose to get into the music business and they have known for over a decade what their obligations are.  They save a bunch of money by using the statutory license instead of direct licensing, and I do not understand why they cannot simply pay what they owe when they owe it like everyone else is supposed to do.

4. Black Box: If I am lucky enough to get a certified statement from a CPA, I have no way of knowing if the CPA ever looked at my earnings or if there are any “black box” earnings that I’m entitled to. Given that I get no certifications and no audits, there’s no telling how much money should have been paid that wasn’t.

I respectfully suggest that the Copyright Office work with CPA associations to find clear guidelines for CPAs to follow that make the services pay out 100% of the money owed to songwriters or give it to the State unclaimed property agencies like an unclaimed utility deposit.

5. Don’t Protect Scofflaws: I am not convinced that these services have gotten all these mistakes done without a plan.  Some may be innocent mistakes, but some seem very calculated.  Respectfully, the Copyright Office should not allow services who have never complied with the law to get protection of the laws they have evaded.

Thank you for this opportunity to hear from me and other songwriters on this important issue.

Sincerely,
David C. Lowery

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
  • Posted in Artist Rights, Copyright, Songwriter Rights
  • Tagged Bob Regan, Copyright Office, Danny O'Keefe, david lowery, Don Coyer, LIsa Thomas Music Service, Michelle Shocked, Section 115, Statements of Account, statutory license
December 10, 2012

What Can Songwriters Do: Copyright Office Comment Period Ends Today for Mechanical Royalty Statements of Account

The Copyright Office public comment period for statements of account on mechanical royalties closes tonight, so there’s still time for songwriters to post comments about the proposed regulations.

The new regulations apply to the license that some services like Spotify rely on for on-demand streaming as well as the new categories of statutory licenses that the Copyright Royalty Judges are expected to approve any day now.  It’s probably hundreds of millions of dollars–and we have no idea whether it ever gets paid or paid right.

Seem like a big number?  Not really when you consider that services like Spotify launch with millions of tracks and those require millions of mechanical licenses for on demand streaming.  They could go to the publishers and songwriters for a direct license, but they prefer to “carpet bomb” notices to songwriters.  If you ask a big publisher they will tell you that they receive hundreds of thousands of these notices every year–and 95% of them are filed late and should be terminated.

One thing the regulations required is that online services have to send songwriters a monthly statement of account certified by an officer of the retailer company as correct.  As far as we can tell, this has never happened.  Why?  Because a “certification” means that the officer of the company is taking responsibility for the accurateness of the statement.  Personal responsibility.  This is exactly the reason why the law requires the certification and exactly the reason why no one has done it as far as we can tell.

The law also requires that a CPA certify the statements on an annual basis.  This has been done once that we know of.

Bear in mind–these licenses have been in place for 10 years.  No certifications in 10 years.  And now the retailers are asking for yet another break through the Digital Media Association (you’ll remember them from IRFA and trying to screw ASCAP songwriters).

Oh, and by the way–you are prohibited from auditing any service that uses the statutory license and the best you can rely on are these certifications and the CPA auditing the retailer’s financials.

We here at the Trichordist think that there are certain aspects of the way that big tech companies have handled the mechanical royalty process that is absolutely horrendous, particularly for indie writers, but truly for everyone.

We want to encourage you to write your own comment.  It can be a letter, you don’t have to be a lawyer or hire one.  If you want to read what other people are saying, you can read the first round of comments at this link:  Initial Comments on Statements of Account.

When you get it written, you can file it at this link:  Copyright Office Electronic Filing Page

In particulary, you might want to read comments from Bob Segar’s publisher, Gear Music or Austin attorney Chris Castle.

Here’s a few reasons why that you might consider in writing to the Copyright Office:

1.  No Audit:  As a songwriter, I have no idea whether I am being paid correctly by any digital service and I am not allowed to audit them.  This is untenable.

2.  Publishers Clearing House: I routinely receive a “notice of intention to use” my work that is always late.  This violates the basic rule of statutory licensing.  The “NOI” I receive comes with a letter asking me to log into a website to see if I am owed money or how much I am owed.  When I go to the website I am asked to sign a click through agreement that makes significant changes to the few statutory rights I have.  This is the worst kind of trickery and is worse than the worst direct mail campaigns because I can always throw away the junk mail.  This trickery involves my life’s work!

3.  Black Box:  If I am lucky enough to get a certified statement from a CPA, I have no way of knowing if the CPA ever looked at my earnings or if there are any “black box” earnings that I’m entitled to.  Given that I get no certifications and no audits, there’s no telling how much money should have been paid that wasn’t.

4. Don’t Protect Scofflaws:  You cannot allow services who have never complied with the law to get protection of the laws they have evaded.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
  • Posted in Artist Rights, Songwriter Rights
  • Tagged Copyright Office, Regulations, Section 115, Statements of Account
  • 2 Comments

Post navigation

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts. You can set for daily or weekly notifications.

Artist Rights Watch

Follow Artist Rights Watch, the news source for the Artist Rights Movement

MOST READ

  • 01 – The Streaming Price Bible – Spotify, YouTube and What 1 Million Plays Means to You!
  • 02 – Over 50 Major Brands Supporting Music Piracy, It’s Big Business!
  • 03 – My Song Got Played On Pandora 1 Million Times and All I Got Was $16.89
  • 04 – Record Labels Invest $4.5 Billion Annually In Artists… Pirates, $0… Any Questions?
  • 05 – Letter To Emily White @ NPR
  • 06 – New Boss Worse Than The Old Boss
  • 07 – Google, Advertising, Money and Piracy. A History of Wrongdoing Exposed.
  • 08 – If the Internet is working for Musicians, Why aren’t more Musicians Working Professionally?
  • 09 – Artists, Know They Enemy!
  • 10 – Two Simple Facts about Technology and Piracy : iTunes Vs. YouTube

Follow The Trichordist on Twitter

  • Every now and then the dog has to question the existence of the mirror twitter.com/vosto/status/1… 6 hours ago
  • Will Apple's Rumored Podcast Subscription Service Derail Spotify? finance.yahoo.com/m/73992dfc-c15… via @Yahoo 6 hours ago
  • RT @TheBlakeMorgan: The emperor has no clothes. #IRespectMusic "Spotify stock (SPOT) has dipped in value following a Citigroup rating drop… 6 hours ago
Follow @thetrichordist

Recent Posts

  • Songwriters Alarmed Biden Admin Looking at Google/Amazon Attorney for Antitrust Chief
  • Guest Post: Streaming and the Embarrassment of COVID Riches
  • Save the Date! January 14 at Noon CST, Zoom Panel with @musictechpolicy @northmusicgroup @sealeinthedeal for Independent Songwriters
  • Please take our Mechanical Licensing Collective Survey
  • Optimism is Contagious, Too: @nivassoc’s #SaveOurStages Included in COVID Stimulus–Update
  • Guest Post: What is the Intention of Justice? Notice and Stay Down is the Government’s Responsibility
  • Curiouser and Curiouser: Strange Loose Ends with Apple Music and The MLC
  • What is Apple Music Up to with the MLC?
  • “MILLION A MONTH” TIM IS BACK WITH NEW IMPROVED PROFITEERING–BUT #IRESPECTMUSIC @THEBLAKEMORGAN FIGHTS BACK–AGAIN
  • The DLC Finally Confirms (Sort Of) How Much is in the MMA Black Box–Bigger than a breadbox
  • As COVID Decimates State Revenues Tennessee Franchise Tax Comes for out of State Performers
  • Black Box Hunting: The Songwriters Guild/Society of Composers & Lyricists/Music Creators North America’s Ex Parte Letter Stands Up for Transparency
  • Guest Post: The False Double Payment Bottom of the MMA Black Box
  • Thank You @irvingazoff!
  • @digitalmusicnws Asks Is the MLC Putting Smaller Streaming Platforms Out of Business? — ArtistRightsWatch
  • Chris Castle’s Copyright Office Comments on the Black Box Controversy
  • MediaNet Trying to Cut Off Black Box Payments
  • SoundExchange Comment on The MLC’s Public Database
  • @CISACnews and BIEM’s Copyright Office Comments on the MLC
  • Future of Music Coalition Warns Against Vendor Lock-in in Copyright Office Comments

Spotify's Greatest Hits!

  • Apple Announces Itunes One Dollar Albums and Ten Cent Song Downloads In Time For The Holidays! | Sillycon Daily News
  • BUT SPOTIFY IS PAYING 70% OF GROSS TO ARTISTS, ISN’T THAT FAIR? NO, AND HERE’S WHY…
  • How to Fix Music Streaming in One Word, “Windows”… two more “Pay Gates”…
  • Jay Frank’s Magical Mystery Streaming Math… Or, Brotha Can Ya Spare A Calculator?
  • Music Streaming Math, Can It All Add Up?
  • Spotify Doesn’t Kill Music Sales like Smoking Doesn’t Cause Cancer…
  • Spotify’s Daniel Ek is Really Bad At Simple Math, “Artists Will Make a Decent Living Off Streaming In Just a Few Years”
  • Streaming Is the Future, Spotify Is Not. Let’s talk Solutions.
  • USA Spotify Streaming Rates Reveal 58% of Streams Are Free, Pays Only 16% Of Revenue
  • Who will be the First Fired Label Execs over Spotify Fiasco & Cannibalization?

Exploitation Economy

  • Aimee Mann Exploited by Russian Brides, Wells Fargo Bank and Nationwide Insurance
  • Billy Corgan Exploited By… Citi Bank, AT&T, Target, Virgin Atlantic, Mazda, Neiman Marcus, Musicians Friend, Hertz, BMW, Audi, Boston Market, Urban Outfitters, Williams Sonoma
  • Dead Kennedys Exploited by Charter, Blizzard, @AlaskaAir and @1800Flowers
  • Dirty Money, Profits From Piracy [video]
  • Jared Leto Exploited by Rapidshare, VW, Go Pro, LG, Emirates Airlines, Adobe, Ford and Target
  • Lou Reed Exploited By American Express, AT&T, Chevorlet, Chili’s, Lysol, Pottery Barn, Vons, Domino’s Pizza, Netflix, Galaxy Nexus and Ron Jeremy!
  • Lyric Pirates Supported by Big Business…
  • MegaUpload (MegaVideo) Smoking Gun? Did the site illegally charge for Streaming Movies? (Star Wars)
  • Neil Young Exploited by Ford, Cooper Mini, Target, State Farm, Adobe, Alaska Air, ATT, Boy Scouts, DIRECTV, LG, Princess Cruises, HP, Westin, Charmin, RapidShare
  • Neko Case Exploited by Macy’s, Levi’s, Princess Cruises, Skype, Yahoo, Marvel and Electronic Arts
  • Talib Kweli Exploited by State Farm Insurance, Neiman Marcus, Ferguson/Kohler, The Ad Council, Google, Ad Choices and Desk Top Strippers
  • Tom Waits Exploited By Wendy’s, Yahoo, BMW, Mitt Romney, Adobe, Cadillac, LG, Target, Westin Hotels, Priceline, Hyatt Hotels, Weight Watchers, VISA, State Farm, Mini Cooper, ADT Security…
  • U2 Exploited by United Airlines, Jet Blue, HP, State Farm, Westin, Urban Outfitters, Sprint, AT&T, Amazon, Disney Resorts, Crate and Barrel

Pandora Joins Evil (IRFA)

  • * Bad News, Good News, Bad News. Internet Radio “Fairness” Act Sponsor and Conservative UT Congressman Chaffetz Taunts Musicians; Admits to Belief in Evolution; Urges Government Interference In Markets.
  • * Four Simple Reasons Why the Pandora Radio Act Screws Musicians (EZ Reader)
  • * IRFA and the Future of Music Policy Summit: Why Would FOMC Miss An Opportunity to Defend Artist Rights?
  • * IRFA is the Broadcast Industry’s SOPA. Censors Free Speech
  • * Is Tim Westergren (Pandora) Really Just A Beard For Clear Channel?
  • * Lobbyist For CCIA Makes All Kinds of Wild Claims About Copyright Management Organizations. BMI ASCAP SOCAN SAMI Included in Charges of Corruption.
  • * Muzzling Free Speech By Artists: IRFA Section 5 Analysis
  • * Pandora Comes Out Of The Closet; Confirms Clear Channel and Pandora “More Than Just Friends’
  • * Sign the @musiciansunion (AFM) Letter: Friends don’t let friends get IRFA’d!
  • * Untruth in Advertising: Pandora’s Misleading Plea To Listeners On Behalf Of The Internet Radio “Fairness” Act.

Categories

Blogroll

  • 300 Songs
  • Ad Land
  • Andreas Ekstrom
  • Andrew Orlowski's Excellent Column at The Register @regvulture
  • Copy Like
  • Copyhype
  • Copyright Alliance
  • Copyright And Technology
  • Cynical Musician
  • Dean's List
  • Ethical Fan
  • Fareplay
  • Helienne Lindvall's Excellent Column at the Guardian @helienne
  • I Buy My Music
  • Jeremy Nicholl
  • Ladies of the Canyon
  • Popup Pirates–Ellen Seidler's blog
  • The Illusion Of More
  • The Lonestar Rollergirls
  • Unionosity

Archives

ethical internet

Is Your Band Registered to Vote? Click here to find out from CanIVote.org!

Vote for artist rights on November 4!

    David Lowery

    • _ Meet The New Boss, Worse Than The Old Boss?
    • _ Mellencamp Character Assassination. The New Republic Bravely Stands Up For Corporations and Criminal Groups That Exploit Artists.
    • _ The Most Important Fact Academics and The Copyleft Neglect to Mention: Copyright is Optional.
    • _ Video of the “Radio Active” panel at The Future of Music Summit 2012.
    • _ You Can’t Have A Have A Healthy Market Economy Without Property Rights. Why Do So Many In Tech Blogosphere Want To Abolish Cyber Property Rights And Cripple The Cyber-Economy?

    You Should Know!

    • Why Spotify is not Netflix (But Maybe It Should Be)
    • _ Fortune 500 Advertising Pirates
    • _ How Copyright Encourages Innovation in Hollywood
    • _ IFRA is SOPA Against Musicians (Pandora Censorship Act)
    • _ Infringement Really Is Theft
    • _ John Perry Barlow Is Wrong! (EFF)
    • _ Larry Lessig Is Wrong! (Creative Commons)
    • _ SF Gate Blunders Piracy Facts
    • _ The Bad Science and Greed Behind the "IP is Inhibiting Innovation Argument"
    • _ The Sky Is RIsing : Magic Beaver Edition

    Dig Deeper

    • _ Artists For An Ethical Internet
    • _ Artists Have Rights Too
    • _ Empty Threats from Freehadists "We're Gonna Boycott Your Band"
    • _ Enemies Of Artists Organize on Internet
    • _ How Tech Policy Cripples The Information Economy
    • _ Mike Lombardo Smackdown [video]
    • _ Smells Like Pirate Desperation…
    • _ Spotify is NOT Good For Artists…
    • _ Streaming Price Index : What Artists Get Paid
    • _ The Human Rights Of Artists

    Guest Posts

    • _ 1,000 True Fans (an answer) by Robert Rich
    • _ Are You Worthy? by Doña Oxford
    • _ Mark Isham Guest Post – Artists Deserve To Be Compensated For Their Work
    • _ Music NOT Like Water By Gavin Casleton
    • _ Occupy Artists Rights by Chris Whitten
    • _ Piracy Counter Arguments by Zach Hemsey
    • _ The Paradox Of Pirate Logic by Chris Whitten

    Contact

    You can contact us by sending an email directly to : the trichordist (one word) at mail dot com.
Blog at WordPress.com.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: