2 Tentative Conclusions About Fight For Future: They read Trichordist and are terrible liars

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 6.38.09 PM

Bad bad Sony!  Made you take down the video!

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 6.38.22 PM

Oh wait no they didn’t.  And what’s up with that 2016 copyright notice?  Thought you uploaded the video in 2013? (see below)

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 6.54.29 PM

Above you state you “published a political commentary about Martin Luther King’s I have a Dream Speech.”  Really where is the political commentary?  This is simply the entire MLK speech with a little voice over on the front that encourages mass copyright infringement.

Let’s ask a very simple “yes or no” question here?  Did you receive permission from the King estate to “share” the entire MLK speech on YouTube?

No?  Didn’t think so.

Did you get to keep your video up even though you are violating the MLK estate rights?


So admit it.  You don’t really have anything to complain about here do you?  You are simply demagoguing using the legacy of MLK to stir up false moral outrage about something that never happened?    How is Fight For The Future any better than all the other low-life corporate funded astroturf organizations that peddle fear to keep their shitty little racket going?

Now go crawl back under your rock.




By Dr. David C Lowery

Platinum selling singer songwriter for the bands Cracker and Camper Van Beethoven; platinum selling producer; founder of pitch-a-tent records; founder Sound of Music Studios; platinum selling music publisher; angel investor; digital skeptic; college lecturer and founder of the University of Georgia Terry College Artists' Rights Symposium.