Synchronized #TeamSpotify Blogger Dave Allen @DaveAtNORTH Reveals His Choice For 4th Horseman of the Spotocalypse!

Last week I wrote about the curious seemingly synchronized Pro-Spotify swimming – er I mean blogging by Jay Frank, Dave Allen and Bob Lefsetz.  Their seemingly synchronized attacks come whenever an artist speaks out about the abysmal royalties paid by multi-billion dollar Silicon Valley firms.   In Particular the 5.6 billion dollar on-demand streaming company Spotify.

They performed this seemingly synchronized swimming routine with me.  And more recently they did it to David Byrne.

Because of this, I good naturedly poked fun at the three.   Partly because there were only 3 of them.  I dubbed them the 3 horsemen of the Spotocalypse.

You see if 6 is the number of the beast then 3 is the number of the comedian.

“Dave Allen, Bob Lefsetz and Daniel Eck walk into a liquidity event”

3 is snot a serious number.

In my piece I  suggested that no one would ever take them seriously until they had a fourth member.  The Four Horseman of the Spotocalypse!   You see four is an extremely masculine and world changing number.

The Fantastic Four.  Masculine

The Fab Four.  Masculine and World Changing.

98 Degrees.  Masculine, world changing and they perform with their shirts off!

While our readers suggested that they add Kim Jong Un the dictator of North Korea as the fourth horseman we now see that Dave Allen has implicity revealed their choice for the 4th Horseman of the Spotocalpyse. 

<drumroll>  The envelope inside the  YouTube Music Award Cake please <drum crash>

“The 4th member of the Spotocalypse is Tim Quirk from Google.   <applause><cue music> <cue weird Greta Gerwig dance >

I’ve got to admit we were wrong.   This is an inspired choice.  Tim is both Cuddly and Angry.    Good work guys!  We really didn’t see that coming!

Oh and by the way Dave Allen by what measure are you “winning” and we are “losing the battle and the war?”  Let’s check the facts.

*The Scooby Doo gang killed Pandoras Internet Radio Fairness Act.

*There are now around the clock saturation stories examining Spotify’s seemingly meager royalties.

* The white house set up a task force on ad supported piracy.

And we did it with no secret corporate cash, subsidized travel expenses and we didn’t set up a 501 3(C).  We’ve not lost the battle or the war. Frankly it lots a lot like we are winning.

Finally Dave,cut the straw man argument crap!  You are just as bad as Tim.

Straw Man Argument:  Your critics want to  “keep music confined to a round, shiny disc that costs $18.99.”

Dave.  No one is saying that.  But go ahead.  Show me one example of your critics saying that.   Don’t you have business connections to Google through Cash Music?  Google should be able to snoop in someones gmail and find someone saying that?  Right? I mean if it really happend.

(Isn’t  that the purpose of those not-so secret barges that Google is building?  To sit in international waters and snoop our email beyond the reach of  US wiretapping laws?  )

One again Dave, Artists are simply asking for fair pay from these digital services.  Failing that we want the right to withdraw from these services. Nothing else.  You can’t just make shit up.

#YTMA Artists Can Help Clean Up YouTube: An Open Letter To Jason Schwartzman, Lady Gaga, Spike Jonze, M.I.A. Arcade Fire and Macklemore.

This is not about whether the YouTube Music Awards were a train wreck or not.  I’m not going to criticize the overall quality of the show’s production.  Live shows are tough.  I’m a performer, I know.   I’ll leave the criticism or praise of the show itself to others.   I enjoyed the show and thought it had its moments.  It was nice the public got a vote. And hey Eminem even got an award for an album that wasn’t out yet!

This is not a pile on.  This is about something entirely different.

This is about YouTube’s lack of corporate responsibility and artists’ traditional role as the first to use their influence to demand corporate responsibility in the face of massive corporate influence. 

This is about otherwise sensible and decent artists who I LIKE AND RESPECT that seem to have been unwittingly duped into lending their credibility to a site that hosts and often directly monetizes (with advertising) videos that promote hate, animal cruelty videos, human trafficking ads, beheading videos, jihadi recruiting videos, playlists devoted to violence against women and other disgusting stuff.  This site is YouTube. 

Think about it.

*Would artists perform on the MTV music awards if MTV broadcast hate videos from bands like Final War, Skrewdriver or Kill Baby Kill?  (That would never get past MTV’s standards and practices)

*Would an artist host the Grammys if The Recording Academy  were in the business of distributing cat kicking videos? (That would never get past CBS’s standards and practices)

*Would artists perform for a network that also had channels that seemed to be exclusively devoted to rape scenes? Real and from movies?

*And again, would artists make videos for a company that distributed a snuff film that shows a man decapitating his wife?

(Ed note: It should be noted that extreme violence,violence towards women, racism, hate, etc are all standard exclusions in artists recording and publishing agreements for licensing – and for good reason.  Why should YouTube get a pass on this?)

Now I feel confident that no artist who participated in the YouTube awards would knowingly support this kind of activity. I have to assume that they are as unaware as I was that this unspeakable stuff is on YouTube and YouTube is profiting from its repeated viewings.   If it weren’t for my University of Georgia research I would not have been aware of the extent of the problem either.

However, unlike many problems in the world, this is a problem artists can actually do something about and do some good in the process.

Assuming that YouTube does their music awards next year,  artists could do good by demanding that YouTube clean up their act before participating.  And there’s no time like the present to get started with the clean up.

I anticipate that YouTube will say that the videos violate YouTube’s terms of service and that YouTube will take down the videos if they are notified by a sufficient number of members of the YouTube community.  Or you could say that YouTube will take them down if YouTube gets caught enough times. (They never say how many “flags” are enough.)

Many of the videos already have graphic content disclaimers.  Someone–presumably YouTube itself or the YouTube community–has already flagged these videos, so YouTube knows what they are hosting!   I think YouTube needs to be much more proactive in cleaning up their act, and the artists who associate themselves with YouTube have an opportunity to do something about it.

Artists who performed this year could do good now by publicly  demanding that YouTube take down these offensive videos, stop advertising on the videos and give to charity Google’s share of all revenue generated to date from these videos.  For instance, the revenue from the Final War song below could be donated to The Anti-Defamation League.

Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 2.30.29 PM

Beheading Videos.

I’m leaving out the screen capture on this one.  But if you search YouTube for “Beheading Mexico”  you will find a snuff film of a man decapitating a woman, (purportedly for infidelity). There is no news or freedom of speech issue here.   There is no editorializing or reporting here.  Just the raw footage.  You also find the chainsaw beheading execution of a man by the a notorious drug cartel. The reason the drug cartel filmed this execution was to intimidate and terrify people. Same with decapitation by various radical jihadi groups.  By hosting and profiting from these videos YouTube is amplifying the terror these groups intended to cause.

In the past when I queried this search on YouTube I came up with sponsored (advertised) videos for “male baldness cures” and other odd products that relate to the head. This leads me to believe there is some sort of keyword specific advertising going on.

Playlists Devoted to Violence Against Women

YouTube has thousands of videos that depict rapes and violence against women.  Some are scenes from movies but others appear to be real footage from security cameras, cellphones and even professional cameras.   Regardless they are often grouped into playlists.  It should also be pointed out that many of the rape videos purport to be of underage girls (see below). I believe these titles are designed to specifically appeal to pedophiles.   If anyone does not believe that these videos have any effect on the young men who watch them just read the comments.   I dare you.

Here’s one such playlist “YouTube Mix – rape camera”   (I’ve catalogued dozens). The first video below “sketch” may seem to have an innocent title but trust me you don’t want to watch it. This playlist also contains a notorious and disturbing real video of a young teenage girl apparently being groped and molested on a school bus.   Note the advertising from Inspirato/American Express, Airborne and Xfinity.   Tweet at American Express.  Tweet at Xfininity.

Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 9.14.21 PM

Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 10.04.23 PM

Screen Shot 2013-11-06 at 12.57.55 AM

Neo Nazi bands and recruitment.

There are hundreds if not thousands of videos by Neo Nazi and  hate bands on YouTube.   Check the ADL list of “Bigots that Rock” and try a YouTube search yourself. Two things quickly become apparent.

1) Many of these videos YouTube has monetized with advertising.

2) The YouTube channels that host these videos appear to be actively recruiting members for various hate groups.  Look at the comments and email addresses displayed in the videos.

In the example below RNskins88 channel appears to be run by a Greek neo nazi group but in comments I’ve highlighted a supporter of the Aryan secessionist group Northwest Front actively recruiting. (BTW 88= Heil Hitler)

Tweet at Showtime.  Tweet at Chevrolet. 

Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 10.37.03 PM

Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 10.50.00 PM

Screen Shot 2013-11-05 at 11.02.14 PM

Do it for the kids.

These are just a few of the numerous categories of vile videos you find on YouTube.  It’s really quite startling when you begin to examine what they will host and monetize.  But to me the much bigger problem is that YouTube’s key music demographic are children.

If you have children you know that they don’t listen to Spotify or iTunes radio.  They get their music from YouTube.  They watch TV on YouTube.  They get the vast majority of their entertainment from YouTube.  While YouTube theoretically age restricts videos all the videos above are available even if you are not logged into an account.  Thus they are not age restricted unless you are logged in. I didn’t even get a graphic content warning on several of the most violent videos.   So basically when your kids are on YouTube ALL of this content is there and available to them to watch.

Music videos drive a large percentage, if not a majority of the traffic to YouTube so we artists have a special obligation to ensure that we are not a “gateway drug” for the really disgusting stuff that YouTube hosts.  I humbly ask you to join me and ask YouTube to clean up their act.  Do it for the kids.

This is not a matter of freedom of speech or censorship.  YouTube is a private company and they can choose NOT to host certain videos. They already choose NOT to host porn and certain other content.   If someone really believes they need to show the world a beheading video they can post it on their own website.  YouTube is not required under first amendment principles to host it.  That is a false argument.   And they are certainly not required to monetize videos like these with advertising.

If YouTube really wants to be an alternative to television and have the YouTube music awards be a rival to the Grammys they are gonna have to clean up their act.

Eminem Makes Public Service Announcement Against Music Piracy | AHH

Eminem sent out a public service announcement to address online piracy in the wake of his latest album The Marshall Mathers LP 2.

The album leaked online earlier this week and the Shady Records machine quickly went to work to suppress the leak. Eminem and his management even went as far as making Rap Genius remove the lyrics to the songs.

READ THE FULL STORY AT ALL HIP HOP:
http://allhiphop.com/2013/11/01/eminem-makes-public-service-announcement-against-music-piracy/

Amanda Palmer: Spotify and iTunes “Aren’t Putting Any Money Back Into Content Creation” | DMN

We’ll be running more of the artist feedback and commentary from last week’s Virgin Disrupters roundtable. Here’s Amanda Palmer,

“Can I speak up here? I’d like to just add to what Zoe [Keating] was saying. There’s also – the other kind of general problem that I think we’re seeing that doesn’t really get addressed very much because it’s so big and possibly un-fixable is that as bad and clunky as the major label system was, you still had a constant influx of capital back from those giant, sometimes soul-sucking systems, back into content creation.

And one weird thing is that iTunes, Apple, Spotify, Google, whatever, all of the people who are profiting – [and] YouTube – who are profiting off the artists from the small level to the huge levels aren’t really feeding very much back into the creation of new content.

READ THE FULL STORY AT DIGITAL MUSIC NEWS:
http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2013/10/29/palmeritunesspotify

Fetishize The Past? Google Executive’s Double-Vinyl-Gatefold-Sleeve-Rock-Opera Of A Straw Man Argument.

Paul Resnikoff at Digital Music News was masochistic enough to transcribe a rant  given by Google’s Tim Quirk at Future Of Music Coalition Conference last month. Tim takes a blog from The New Yorker that may or may not romanticize shopping for vinyl in shops in the 90s.  He then makes a false equivalency between that and artist’s current criticism of the current digital services and royalties.

This is the mother of all straw man arguments.  And again we need to call him out on it.

Artists are not fetishizing the past.   They are simply asking for fair pay in the digital age. End of story.  

Of course there is another interpretation of this.  Is Quirk implying fair artist royalties are some sort of fetish from the past?

If this is the case, count me as really confused. For wasn’t it Tim Quirk who in 2009 magnificiently ranted on his band’s website (Quirk was in the band Too Much Joy)  how his old record label Warner Bros was not properly crediting his account with digital royalties?

http://www.toomuchjoy.com/index.php/2009/12/my-hilarious-warner-bros-royalty-statement/

I quote from his blog:

“So I was naively excited when I opened the envelope. And my answer was right there on the first page. In five years, our three albums earned us a grand total of…

$62.47

What the fuck?”

So what happened to the 2009 Tim?

I’ll tell you.  He got a Job at Google.  Meet the new boss Tim.  Yourself.

(BTW all artists should read the transcription of Tim’s remarks.  There is a visceral hostility toward artists throughout the entire piece that is quite startling  considering he is an executive in Google’s music division. Just saying.)

#YTMA: YouTube Music Awards You’ll Never See: RU486, DIY Abortions, Steroids and Human Growth Hormone

Google paid a fine of $500,000,000 of the stockholders’ money to keep their senior management team from being indicted for violations of the Controlled Substances Act.  This fine followed a multi-year sting operation by the Department of Justice, the Internal Revenue Service and the Food and Drug Administration that proved that Google was complicit in the sale of a variety of prescription drugs without a prescription including the abortion drug RU486, steroids and Human Growth Hormone.

RU486 not only is a drug that requires a prescription, but it also is to be administered under a doctor’s supervision.  According to Planned Parenthood, the drug is intended for women who are pregnant (different than the “morning after” pill) and:

It is administered under the supervision of a physician with appropriate follow up to assure completion of the abortion.

It is not available from a pharmacy

And what might be the demographic of the audience that these drug dealers are trying to reach?  Remember–this is not some rogue site on the Internet, this is YouTube.  100% within Google’s control.

So here are some music videos that won’t be part of the YouTube Music Awards:

1.  Do You Need a Prescription for RU 486?

2.  DIY: Medical Abortion (another YouTube “how to” video to self-administer RU486)

3.  Easy At Home Abortions:  This one appears to be a pro-life video of a woman telling her story with captions linking to “a cheap and even safer way to abort”

4.  Buy Steroids Online

5.  Buy HGH: Where to Buy HGH?

T Bone Burnett vs. Silicon Valley: ‘We Should Go Up There With Pitchforks and Torches’ | THR

The entire infrastructure that supported the world of music for a century has been dismantled, and in its place we’ve got these little things, these little handheld devices. The worldwide web was supposed to give everybody access and democratize everything. It was supposed to create a level field and increase the middle class and everybody had more access and more information. But now anybody can say anything and nobody cares. This is the problem of ubiquitous data.

And what’s happened in reality is that the power’s been consolidated in very, very few companies, and the middle class of musicians really has just been wiped out. I mean, the Internet has been an honest-to-God con.

READ THE FULL STORY AT THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER:
http://m.hollywoodreporter.com/earshot/t-bone-burnett-silicon-valley-652114

#YTMA: YouTube Music Awards You’ll Never See: Jihadi Recruiting Videos

YouTube is a very popular communications medium to recruit jihadis and to distribute news of the jihad.  Here’s a few examples:

1.  Equip a Fighter This Ramadan

2.  Jihadi Attack on Ship in Suez Canal

3.  Execution of Syrians in Town Square by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (al Qaeda in Iraq)

4.  Khost CIA Suicide Bomber is on Tape with Leader of Taliban in Pakistan

khost

Hakeemullah Mehsud (left), the Leader of the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan, and Humam Khalil Muhammed Abu Mulal al Balawi (right), the suicide bomber who carried out the attack at Combat Outpost Chapman in Khost, Afghanistan that was a plot point in Zero Dark Thirty.  Here’s a link to the video but you’ll see that it’s been made “private” courtesy of YouTube.

5.  Armstrong and Miller Martyrdom Video

and on a lighter note…